ALRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Datadog has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 3.24%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.01%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $135.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Datadog.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.945%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is higher than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Datadog's PE ratio is 255.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.58x versus 14.94x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of -12.88%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of -1.31%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.01%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.72 which suggests that it could grow by 0.65%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.287%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $289.5M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of -$37.3M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 519.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.58x versus 16.17x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 36.37%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.01%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $773.81 which suggests that it could grow by 2.91%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Intuit.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.835%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.58x versus 11.70x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 20.01%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $68.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.01%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $211.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.52%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.468%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $238.8M, which are smaller than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $262.8M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $28M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 54.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.58x versus 11.26x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.