IGM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a net margin of 27.2% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of -13780.74%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 15.8% beat Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2%.

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of $49.71, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IGM Financial has higher upside potential than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings, analysts believe IGM Financial is more attractive than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 51.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IGM Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IGM Financial pays 46.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial quarterly revenues are $879.5M, which are larger than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues of -$14.7K. IGM Financial's net income of $239.2M is higher than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, IGM Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial is 3.27x versus 18.92x for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fiera Capital has a net margin of 27.2% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of 7.43%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 15.8% beat Fiera Capital's return on equity of 20.74%.

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of $49.71, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Fiera Capital has an analysts' consensus of $10.13 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Fiera Capital has higher upside potential than IGM Financial, analysts believe Fiera Capital is more attractive than IGM Financial.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 51.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiera Capital has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.286%.

IGM Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Fiera Capital offers a yield of 9.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. IGM Financial pays 46.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiera Capital pays out 153.06% of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiera Capital's is not.

IGM Financial quarterly revenues are $879.5M, which are larger than Fiera Capital quarterly revenues of $170M. IGM Financial's net income of $239.2M is higher than Fiera Capital's net income of $12.6M. Notably, IGM Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Fiera Capital's PE ratio is 15.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial is 3.27x versus 1.44x for Fiera Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris Northstar Capital has a net margin of 27.2% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of --. IGM Financial's return on equity of 15.8% beat Polaris Northstar Capital's return on equity of --.

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of $49.71, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Polaris Northstar Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IGM Financial has higher upside potential than Polaris Northstar Capital, analysts believe IGM Financial is more attractive than Polaris Northstar Capital.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 51.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris Northstar Capital has a beta of 8.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 729.945%.

IGM Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Polaris Northstar Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IGM Financial pays 46.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris Northstar Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial quarterly revenues are $879.5M, which are larger than Polaris Northstar Capital quarterly revenues of --. IGM Financial's net income of $239.2M is higher than Polaris Northstar Capital's net income of --. Notably, IGM Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Polaris Northstar Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial is 3.27x versus -- for Polaris Northstar Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SOL Global Investments has a net margin of 27.2% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of 83.88%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 15.8% beat SOL Global Investments's return on equity of -251.4%.

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of $49.71, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand SOL Global Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IGM Financial has higher upside potential than SOL Global Investments, analysts believe IGM Financial is more attractive than SOL Global Investments.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 51.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SOL Global Investments has a beta of 2.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.596%.

IGM Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. SOL Global Investments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IGM Financial pays 46.61% of its earnings as a dividend. SOL Global Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial quarterly revenues are $879.5M, which are larger than SOL Global Investments quarterly revenues of -$3.6M. IGM Financial's net income of $239.2M is higher than SOL Global Investments's net income of -$3M. Notably, IGM Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while SOL Global Investments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial is 3.27x versus -- for SOL Global Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.