CIX.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiera Capital has a net margin of -3.18% compared to CI Financial's net margin of 7.43%. CI Financial's return on equity of -6.95% beat Fiera Capital's return on equity of 20.74%.

CI Financial has a consensus price target of $31.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Fiera Capital has an analysts' consensus of $10.13 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Fiera Capital has higher upside potential than CI Financial, analysts believe Fiera Capital is more attractive than CI Financial.

CI Financial has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiera Capital has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.286%.

CI Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Fiera Capital offers a yield of 9.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. CI Financial pays 2501.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiera Capital pays out 153.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CI Financial quarterly revenues are $868.6M, which are larger than Fiera Capital quarterly revenues of $170M. CI Financial's net income of -$27.6M is lower than Fiera Capital's net income of $12.6M. Notably, CI Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fiera Capital's PE ratio is 15.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Financial is 1.52x versus 1.44x for Fiera Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IGM Financial has a net margin of -3.18% compared to CI Financial's net margin of 27.2%. CI Financial's return on equity of -6.95% beat IGM Financial's return on equity of 15.8%.

CI Financial has a consensus price target of $31.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand IGM Financial has an analysts' consensus of $49.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.68%. Given that IGM Financial has higher upside potential than CI Financial, analysts believe IGM Financial is more attractive than CI Financial.

CI Financial has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IGM Financial has a beta of 1.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.992%.

CI Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. IGM Financial offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. CI Financial pays 2501.79% of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial pays out 46.61% of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CI Financial's is not.

CI Financial quarterly revenues are $868.6M, which are smaller than IGM Financial quarterly revenues of $879.5M. CI Financial's net income of -$27.6M is lower than IGM Financial's net income of $239.2M. Notably, CI Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IGM Financial's PE ratio is 9.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Financial is 1.52x versus 3.27x for IGM Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris Northstar Capital has a net margin of -3.18% compared to CI Financial's net margin of --. CI Financial's return on equity of -6.95% beat Polaris Northstar Capital's return on equity of --.

CI Financial has a consensus price target of $31.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Polaris Northstar Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Financial has higher upside potential than Polaris Northstar Capital, analysts believe CI Financial is more attractive than Polaris Northstar Capital.

CI Financial has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris Northstar Capital has a beta of 8.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 729.945%.

CI Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Polaris Northstar Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Financial pays 2501.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris Northstar Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI Financial quarterly revenues are $868.6M, which are larger than Polaris Northstar Capital quarterly revenues of --. CI Financial's net income of -$27.6M is higher than Polaris Northstar Capital's net income of --. Notably, CI Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polaris Northstar Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Financial is 1.52x versus -- for Polaris Northstar Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SOL Global Investments has a net margin of -3.18% compared to CI Financial's net margin of 83.88%. CI Financial's return on equity of -6.95% beat SOL Global Investments's return on equity of -251.4%.

CI Financial has a consensus price target of $31.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand SOL Global Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Financial has higher upside potential than SOL Global Investments, analysts believe CI Financial is more attractive than SOL Global Investments.

CI Financial has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SOL Global Investments has a beta of 2.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.596%.

CI Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. SOL Global Investments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Financial pays 2501.79% of its earnings as a dividend. SOL Global Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI Financial quarterly revenues are $868.6M, which are larger than SOL Global Investments quarterly revenues of -$3.6M. CI Financial's net income of -$27.6M is lower than SOL Global Investments's net income of -$3M. Notably, CI Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SOL Global Investments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Financial is 1.52x versus -- for SOL Global Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.