WMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelerate Energy has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 15.54%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity of 4.03%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.03%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy has an analysts' consensus of $32.90 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Excelerate Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Excelerate Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Excelerate Energy offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Excelerate Energy quarterly revenues of $315.1M. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than Excelerate Energy's net income of $49M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Excelerate Energy's PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.87x versus 1.34x for Excelerate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 6.29%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.65%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.03%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 29.26%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.928%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $21B. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.87x versus 0.73x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 6.48%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.03%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $258.15 which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.511%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 17.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.87x versus 3.18x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of -41.95%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $60.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.03%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.83 which suggests that it could grow by 254.75%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.875%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 16.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $470.5M. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.87x versus 0.27x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.