WM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -23.73%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -43.18%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $244.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 105.71%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.214%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $14.7M. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.30x while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 4.12x versus 2.23x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -13.59%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $244.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.83 which suggests that it could grow by 192.02%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.59%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $70M. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.30x while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 4.12x versus 0.17x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 12.35%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $244.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $252.65 which suggests that it could grow by 0.72%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Republic Services.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.487%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than Republic Services's net income of $495M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.30x while Republic Services's PE ratio is 37.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 4.12x versus 4.87x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

374Water has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Waste Management's net margin of -3315.52%. Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat 374Water's return on equity of -83.56%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $244.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand 374Water has an analysts' consensus of $2.5000 which suggests that it could grow by 755.29%. Given that 374Water has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe 374Water is more attractive than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 374Water has a beta of -0.183, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.281%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. 374Water offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. 374Water pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than 374Water quarterly revenues of $81.5K. Waste Management's net income of $637M is higher than 374Water's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.30x while 374Water's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 4.12x versus 88.01x for 374Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.