WAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delcath Systems has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Waters's net margin of 16.64%. Waters's return on equity of 49.2% beat Delcath Systems's return on equity of -251.36%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $388.96, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Delcath Systems has an analysts' consensus of $21.83 which suggests that it could grow by 45.75%. Given that Delcath Systems has higher upside potential than Waters, analysts believe Delcath Systems is more attractive than Waters.

Waters has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.69900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delcath Systems has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.965%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delcath Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delcath Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Waters quarterly revenues are $740.3M, which are larger than Delcath Systems quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Waters's net income of $161.5M is higher than Delcath Systems's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Delcath Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 8.46x versus 17.95x for Delcath Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Danaher has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Waters's net margin of 14.11%. Waters's return on equity of 49.2% beat Danaher's return on equity of 7.47%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $388.96, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Danaher has an analysts' consensus of $284.39 which suggests that it could grow by 16.5%. Given that Danaher has higher upside potential than Waters, analysts believe Danaher is more attractive than Waters.

Waters has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.69900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danaher has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.553%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danaher offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danaher pays out 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Danaher's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waters quarterly revenues are $740.3M, which are smaller than Danaher quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Waters's net income of $161.5M is lower than Danaher's net income of $818M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Danaher's PE ratio is 46.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 8.46x versus 7.63x for Danaher. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progyny has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Waters's net margin of 3.64%. Waters's return on equity of 49.2% beat Progyny's return on equity of 11.31%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $388.96, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Progyny has an analysts' consensus of $19.29 which suggests that it could fall by -10.22%. Given that Progyny has more downside risk than Waters, analysts believe Waters is more attractive than Progyny.

Waters has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.69900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progyny has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.352%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progyny offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progyny pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Waters quarterly revenues are $740.3M, which are larger than Progyny quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Waters's net income of $161.5M is higher than Progyny's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Progyny's PE ratio is 37.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 8.46x versus 1.86x for Progyny. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Equity Holdings has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Waters's net margin of -14.42%. Waters's return on equity of 49.2% beat Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $388.96, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Star Equity Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 352.49%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Waters, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Waters.

Waters has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.69900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.44%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Equity Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings pays out 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waters quarterly revenues are $740.3M, which are larger than Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues of $13.7M. Waters's net income of $161.5M is higher than Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Star Equity Holdings's PE ratio is 0.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 8.46x versus 0.14x for Star Equity Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.