UHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Health Systems has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of -0.41%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 18.03% beat Community Health Systems's return on equity of --.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $225.34, signalling upside risk potential of 29.76%. On the other hand Community Health Systems has an analysts' consensus of $4.21 which suggests that it could grow by 31.7%. Given that Community Health Systems has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Community Health Systems is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Health Systems has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.051%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Community Health Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Health Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Community Health Systems quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Universal Health Services's net income of $316.7M is higher than Community Health Systems's net income of -$13M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Community Health Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.73x versus 0.03x for Community Health Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCA Healthcare has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 8.79%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 18.03% beat HCA Healthcare's return on equity of 822.75%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $225.34, signalling upside risk potential of 29.76%. On the other hand HCA Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $386.48 which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that Universal Health Services has higher upside potential than HCA Healthcare, analysts believe Universal Health Services is more attractive than HCA Healthcare.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCA Healthcare has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.858%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. HCA Healthcare offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. HCA Healthcare pays out 11.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than HCA Healthcare quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Universal Health Services's net income of $316.7M is lower than HCA Healthcare's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while HCA Healthcare's PE ratio is 16.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.73x versus 1.33x for HCA Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nutex Health has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 6.91%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 18.03% beat Nutex Health's return on equity of 46.74%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $225.34, signalling upside risk potential of 29.76%. On the other hand Nutex Health has an analysts' consensus of $248.33 which suggests that it could grow by 103.09%. Given that Nutex Health has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Nutex Health is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutex Health has a beta of 0.038, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.219%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Nutex Health offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Nutex Health pays out 12.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Nutex Health quarterly revenues of $211.8M. Universal Health Services's net income of $316.7M is higher than Nutex Health's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Nutex Health's PE ratio is 10.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.73x versus 1.10x for Nutex Health. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenet Healthcare has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 7.77%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 18.03% beat Tenet Healthcare's return on equity of 17.82%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $225.34, signalling upside risk potential of 29.76%. On the other hand Tenet Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $185.96 which suggests that it could grow by 12.34%. Given that Universal Health Services has higher upside potential than Tenet Healthcare, analysts believe Universal Health Services is more attractive than Tenet Healthcare.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenet Healthcare has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.295%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Tenet Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Tenet Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Tenet Healthcare quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Universal Health Services's net income of $316.7M is lower than Tenet Healthcare's net income of $406M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Tenet Healthcare's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.73x versus 0.78x for Tenet Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.