SHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 1.97%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.56%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.31, signalling upside risk potential of 8.29%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $48.44 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.995%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Dow offers a yield of 6.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 334.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.9B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Dow's net income of $214M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.26x while Dow's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.92x versus 0.67x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 3.36%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.31, signalling upside risk potential of 8.29%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 25.04%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.26x while Nucor's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.92x versus 0.96x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of --. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.31, signalling upside risk potential of 8.29%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 201.74%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.26x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.92x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 9.93%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat RPM International's return on equity of 25.92%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.31, signalling upside risk potential of 8.29%. On the other hand RPM International has an analysts' consensus of $134.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.64%. Given that Sherwin-Williams has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Sherwin-Williams is more attractive than RPM International.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.788%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. RPM International offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than RPM International quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than RPM International's net income of $183.2M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.26x while RPM International's PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.92x versus 2.21x for RPM International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.