SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 31.49%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.04%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,311.44 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.577% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.856%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $8.75 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $8B. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.04x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 31.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.96x versus 7.02x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 16.85%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.04%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $192.73 which suggests that it could grow by 6.25%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.577% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.12%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.04x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 23.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.96x versus 1.87x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 10.93%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.04%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.99%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.577% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.114%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.04x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.96x versus 1.09x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 7.33%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.04%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.32 which suggests that it could grow by 8.95%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.577% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.373%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $532M. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of $39M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.04x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 66.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.96x versus 1.29x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.