MS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 90.34%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 19.66%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $136.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $66.08 which suggests that it could grow by 57.63%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $1B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $916M. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 26.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.22x versus 13.03x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 8.96%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $136.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $223.30 which suggests that it could grow by 35.56%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.768%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 23.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.22x versus 1.93x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PNC Financial Services Group has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 28.95%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat PNC Financial Services Group's return on equity of 11.1%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $136.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand PNC Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $211.53 which suggests that it could grow by 23.07%. Given that PNC Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe PNC Financial Services Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.729%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. PNC Financial Services Group offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PNC Financial Services Group pays out 49.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than PNC Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than PNC Financial Services Group's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while PNC Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.22x versus 3.30x for PNC Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 34.53%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $136.06, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $90.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.73%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.22x versus 7.28x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.