JWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 12.34%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.99% beat Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.30, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $189.08 which suggests that it could grow by 93.41%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.738%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Boot Barn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues of $608.2M. Nordstrom's net income of $166M is higher than Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.93x while Boot Barn Holdings's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 1.63x for Boot Barn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genesco has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 4.61%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.99% beat Genesco's return on equity of -3.48%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.30, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Genesco has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.55%. Given that Genesco has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Genesco is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesco has a beta of 2.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.292%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Genesco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Genesco quarterly revenues of $745.9M. Nordstrom's net income of $166M is higher than Genesco's net income of $34.4M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.93x while Genesco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 0.09x for Genesco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macy's has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 4.27%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.99% beat Macy's's return on equity of 13.71%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.30, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Macy's has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 30.67%. Given that Macy's has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Macy's is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macy's has a beta of 1.729, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.878%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Macy's offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Macy's pays out 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Macy's quarterly revenues of $8B. Nordstrom's net income of $166M is lower than Macy's's net income of $342M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.93x while Macy's's PE ratio is 5.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 0.14x for Macy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 7.35%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.99% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.30, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $59.69 which suggests that it could grow by 31.95%. Given that Urban Outfitters has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Urban Outfitters is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.366, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.558%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nordstrom's net income of $166M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.93x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 0.77x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.