HIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 11.42% compared to The Hartford Financial Services Group's net margin of 6.8%. The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63% beat American International Group's return on equity of -4.74%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $129.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.99%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than American International Group.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.835%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. American International Group offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M is higher than American International Group's net income of $459M. Notably, The Hartford Financial Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hartford Financial Services Group is 1.26x versus 0.95x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 11.42% compared to The Hartford Financial Services Group's net margin of 7.16%. The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $129.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $222.94 which suggests that it could grow by 19.92%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Hartford Financial Services Group, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Hartford Financial Services Group.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, The Hartford Financial Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hartford Financial Services Group is 1.26x versus 0.79x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 11.42% compared to The Hartford Financial Services Group's net margin of 11.84%. The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $129.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.5882 which suggests that it could grow by 15.86%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Progressive.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, The Hartford Financial Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hartford Financial Services Group is 1.26x versus 1.96x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 11.42% compared to The Hartford Financial Services Group's net margin of 20.22%. The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63% beat RLI's return on equity of 27.72%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $129.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $186.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.66%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than RLI.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.537%.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. RLI offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $470M. The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M is higher than RLI's net income of $95M. Notably, The Hartford Financial Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while RLI's PE ratio is 17.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hartford Financial Services Group is 1.26x versus 4.19x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.