FFIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 21.72% compared to F5's net margin of 10.74%. F5's return on equity of 19.61% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.12%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $304.55, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $88.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.79%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.986%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F5 quarterly revenues are $766.5M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. F5's net income of $166.4M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $546M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.41x versus 1.91x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a net margin of 21.72% compared to F5's net margin of 8.91%. F5's return on equity of 19.61% beat DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of --.

F5 has a consensus price target of $304.55, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $45.46 which suggests that it could grow by 33.05%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $766.5M, which are larger than DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues of $204.9M. F5's net income of $166.4M is higher than DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while DigitalOcean Holdings's PE ratio is 39.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.41x versus 4.19x for DigitalOcean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 21.72% compared to F5's net margin of 8.28%. F5's return on equity of 19.61% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $304.55, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $254.92 which suggests that it could grow by 50.9%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.614%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $766.5M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. F5's net income of $166.4M is higher than EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 21.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.41x versus 2.07x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GitLab has a net margin of 21.72% compared to F5's net margin of 2.75%. F5's return on equity of 19.61% beat GitLab's return on equity of -0.9%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $304.55, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $78.34 which suggests that it could grow by 61.93%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $766.5M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $211.4M. F5's net income of $166.4M is higher than GitLab's net income of $5.8M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.41x versus 10.43x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.