BXP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 9.73% compared to BXP's net margin of 6.22%. BXP's return on equity of 4.42% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 10.4%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $83.53, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $20.55 which suggests that it could grow by 18.94%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than BXP, analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than BXP.

BXP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.387%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.45%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. BXP pays 361.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 73.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BXP's is not.

BXP quarterly revenues are $859.2M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.3B. BXP's net income of $83.6M is higher than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $82M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.16x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 16.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.36x versus 2.19x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 9.73% compared to BXP's net margin of 49.39%. BXP's return on equity of 4.42% beat Prologis's return on equity of 5.33%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $83.53, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $129.14 which suggests that it could grow by 21.08%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than BXP, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than BXP.

BXP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.051%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.45%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. BXP pays 361.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 105.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $859.2M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2B. BXP's net income of $83.6M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1B. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.16x while Prologis's PE ratio is 32.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.36x versus 12.89x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 9.73% compared to BXP's net margin of 28.17%. BXP's return on equity of 4.42% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.68%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $83.53, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.42 which suggests that it could grow by 11.74%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Regency Centers.

BXP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.249%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.45%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. BXP pays 361.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $859.2M, which are larger than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $360.3M. BXP's net income of $83.6M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $101.5M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.16x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 33.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.36x versus 9.07x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of 9.73% compared to BXP's net margin of 32.15%. BXP's return on equity of 4.42% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 68.2%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $83.53, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $186.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.66%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

BXP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.758, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.77%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.45%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. BXP pays 361.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 106.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $859.2M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. BXP's net income of $83.6M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $476M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.16x while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 23.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.36x versus 9.62x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.