Financhill
Buy
58

APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$67.70
Seasonality move :
7.24%
Day range:
$62.81 - $64.28
52-week range:
$54.72 - $79.39
Dividend yield:
0.95%
P/E ratio:
33.34x
P/S ratio:
5.30x
P/B ratio:
7.90x
Volume:
10.1M
Avg. volume:
7.9M
1-year change:
16.53%
Market cap:
$77.3B
Revenue:
$15.2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.92

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
APH
Amphenol
$4.1B $0.50 29.09% 18.06% $84.14
AVGO
Broadcom
$14.6B $1.51 19.72% 254.05% $250.42
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$2.9M -$0.02 19.97% -50% $2.88
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$1.8B $0.59 61.86% -- $113.24
NVDA
NVIDIA
$38.1B $0.85 66.5% 55.48% $172.50
OCC
Optical Cable
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
APH
Amphenol
$63.85 $84.14 $77.3B 33.34x $0.17 0.95% 5.30x
AVGO
Broadcom
$188.67 $250.42 $887.1B 90.62x $0.59 1.15% 16.54x
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$1.65 $2.88 $353.5M -- $0.00 0% 27.39x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$68.28 $113.24 $59.1B -- $0.06 0.35% 10.25x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$115.43 $172.50 $2.8T 39.29x $0.01 0.04% 21.94x
OCC
Optical Cable
$3.23 -- $26.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.37x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
APH
Amphenol
41.29% 0.898 8.43% 1.62x
AVGO
Broadcom
48.82% -0.877 6.42% 0.81x
KULR
KULR Technology Group
19.56% 7.022 2.19% 0.61x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
23.23% 0.885 4.16% 0.98x
NVDA
NVIDIA
9.64% 1.547 0.29% 3.67x
OCC
Optical Cable
29.52% -1.306 20.46% 0.61x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
APH
Amphenol
$1.5B $965.7M 16.82% 26.57% 22.63% $647.3M
AVGO
Broadcom
$10.1B $6.4B 7.23% 14.67% 42.66% $6B
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$2.3M -$1.7M -645.85% -852.31% -53.26% -$3.3M
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$917.4M $222.7M -4.87% -6.29% 13.47% $443.3M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$28.7B $24B 107.08% 123.32% 64.27% $15.6B
OCC
Optical Cable
$4.6M -$852.4K -12.47% -18.34% -5.28% $2.6M

Amphenol vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns APH or AVGO?

    Broadcom has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 36.89%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    68.01% $1.14 $136.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.78%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 32.73%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    28 5 0
  • Is APH or AVGO More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.34x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 90.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 16.54x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.34x $4.3B $746.2M
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    16.54x 90.62x $14.9B $5.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or KULR?

    KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    70.86% -$0.01 $6.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or KULR?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.78%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.88 which suggests that it could grow by 155.56%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    2 0 0
  • Is APH or KULR More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.347%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or KULR?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or KULR?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.34x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 27.39x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.34x $4.3B $746.2M
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    27.39x -- $3.2M -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or MRVL?

    Marvell Technology has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 11.02%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    50.48% $0.23 $17.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.78%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.24 which suggests that it could grow by 65.85%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    26 3 0
  • Is APH or MRVL More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.34x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 10.25x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.34x $4.3B $746.2M
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    10.25x -- $1.8B $200.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 56.17%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    73.03% $0.89 $87.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.78%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49.44%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    45 5 0
  • Is APH or NVDA More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.34x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 21.94x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.34x $4.3B $746.2M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    21.94x 39.29x $39.3B $22.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or OCC?

    Optical Cable has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -7.04%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    29.39% -$0.14 $28M
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or OCC?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.78%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Optical Cable.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    0 0 0
  • Is APH or OCC More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.037%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or OCC?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or OCC?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.34x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 0.37x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.34x $4.3B $746.2M
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    0.37x -- $15.7M -$1.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?
Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?

Alphabet tripled its price per share over the past 5…

Pepsi Vs Coke Stock: Which Is Best?
Pepsi Vs Coke Stock: Which Is Best?

Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) are two of the largest…

Is CyberArk The Next Big Cybersecurity Stock?
Is CyberArk The Next Big Cybersecurity Stock?

CyberArk Software (NASDAQ: CYBR) recently reported phenomenal quarter numbers, passing…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
48
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Mar 19

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 0.66% over the past day.

Sell
49
SRPT alert for Mar 19

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is up 8.72% over the past day.

Sell
46
CVNA alert for Mar 19

Carvana [CVNA] is up 5.74% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock