APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 26.36%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.22 which suggests that it could grow by 188.81%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.347%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.53x versus 24.24x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 11.02%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 26.36%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 81.8%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.53x versus 9.31x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 56.17%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 26.36%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 55.93%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.53x versus 20.85x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -7.04%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.34%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 26.36%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.037%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.53x versus 0.34x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.