Financhill
Buy
59

APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$63.48
Seasonality move :
7.24%
Day range:
$62.60 - $64.58
52-week range:
$54.72 - $79.39
Dividend yield:
0.86%
P/E ratio:
33.35x
P/S ratio:
5.30x
P/B ratio:
7.90x
Volume:
6.8M
Avg. volume:
7.8M
1-year change:
16.85%
Market cap:
$77.3B
Revenue:
$15.2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.92

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
APH
Amphenol
$4.1B $0.50 29.09% 18.06% $84.14
AVGO
Broadcom
$14.6B $1.51 19.77% 254.05% $250.42
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$2.9M -$0.02 19.97% -50% $2.88
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$1.8B $0.59 61.86% -- $113.24
NVDA
NVIDIA
$38.1B $0.85 66.5% 55.48% $172.50
OCC
Optical Cable
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
APH
Amphenol
$63.86 $84.14 $77.3B 33.35x $0.17 0.86% 5.30x
AVGO
Broadcom
$194.50 $250.42 $914.5B 93.42x $0.59 1.12% 17.05x
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$1.76 $2.88 $377M -- $0.00 0% 29.22x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$70.40 $113.24 $61B -- $0.06 0.34% 10.56x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$119.53 $172.50 $2.9T 40.68x $0.01 0.03% 22.72x
OCC
Optical Cable
$3.29 -- $27M -- $0.00 0% 0.38x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
APH
Amphenol
41.29% 0.898 8.43% 1.62x
AVGO
Broadcom
48.82% -0.877 6.42% 0.81x
KULR
KULR Technology Group
19.56% 7.022 2.19% 0.61x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
23.23% 0.885 4.16% 0.98x
NVDA
NVIDIA
9.64% 1.547 0.29% 3.67x
OCC
Optical Cable
29.52% -1.306 20.46% 0.61x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
APH
Amphenol
$1.5B $965.7M 16.82% 26.57% 22.63% $647.3M
AVGO
Broadcom
$10.1B $6.4B 7.23% 14.67% 42.66% $6B
KULR
KULR Technology Group
$2.3M -$1.7M -645.85% -852.31% -53.26% -$3.3M
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$917.4M $222.7M -4.87% -6.29% 13.47% $443.3M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$28.7B $24B 107.08% 123.32% 64.27% $15.6B
OCC
Optical Cable
$4.6M -$852.4K -12.47% -18.34% -5.28% $2.6M

Amphenol vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns APH or AVGO?

    Broadcom has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 36.89%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    68.01% $1.14 $136.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.76%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 28.75%. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Broadcom.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    28 5 0
  • Is APH or AVGO More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or AVGO?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 93.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 17.05x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.35x $4.3B $746.2M
    AVGO
    Broadcom
    17.05x 93.42x $14.9B $5.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or KULR?

    KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    70.86% -$0.01 $6.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or KULR?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.76%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.88 which suggests that it could grow by 139.58%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    2 0 0
  • Is APH or KULR More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.347%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or KULR?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or KULR?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 29.22x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.35x $4.3B $746.2M
    KULR
    KULR Technology Group
    29.22x -- $3.2M -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or MRVL?

    Marvell Technology has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 11.02%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    50.48% $0.23 $17.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.76%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.24 which suggests that it could grow by 60.86%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    26 3 0
  • Is APH or MRVL More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or MRVL?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 10.56x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.35x $4.3B $746.2M
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    10.56x -- $1.8B $200.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 56.17%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    73.03% $0.89 $87.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.76%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.31%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    46 5 0
  • Is APH or NVDA More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or NVDA?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 40.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 22.72x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.35x $4.3B $746.2M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    22.72x 40.68x $39.3B $22.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns APH or OCC?

    Optical Cable has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -7.04%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    APH
    Amphenol
    34.29% $0.59 $16.7B
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    29.39% -$0.14 $28M
  • What do Analysts Say About APH or OCC?

    Amphenol has a consensus price target of $84.14, signalling upside risk potential of 31.76%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Optical Cable.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    APH
    Amphenol
    8 7 0
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    0 0 0
  • Is APH or OCC More Risky?

    Amphenol has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.037%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock APH or OCC?

    Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios APH or OCC?

    Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.30x versus 0.38x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    APH
    Amphenol
    5.30x 33.35x $4.3B $746.2M
    OCC
    Optical Cable
    0.38x -- $15.7M -$1.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
Is the Market Going to Go Lower?

The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…

2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession

While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…

Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?

There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
63
EXOD alert for Mar 18

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 0.25% over the past day.

Sell
45
MNPR alert for Mar 18

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 2.78% over the past day.

Sell
47
CELH alert for Mar 18

Celsius Holdings [CELH] is down 0.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock