TCEHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baidu has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 22.74%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Baidu's return on equity of 7.86%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baidu has an analysts' consensus of $109.35 which suggests that it could grow by 34.44%. Given that Baidu has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Baidu is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 83.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baidu has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.412%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Baidu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Baidu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Baidu quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than Baidu's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while Baidu's PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.19x versus 1.53x for Baidu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bilibili has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of -1.09%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Bilibili's return on equity of -19.15%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bilibili has an analysts' consensus of $23.62 which suggests that it could grow by 40.82%. Given that Bilibili has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Bilibili is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 83.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.075%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Bilibili offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Bilibili quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than Bilibili's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while Bilibili's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.19x versus 1.97x for Bilibili. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQIYI has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 3.17%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat iQIYI's return on equity of 11.31%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iQIYI has an analysts' consensus of $2.65 which suggests that it could grow by 31.02%. Given that iQIYI has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe iQIYI is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 83.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI has a beta of 0.017, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.326%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. iQIYI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than iQIYI quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than iQIYI's net income of $32M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while iQIYI's PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.19x versus 0.47x for iQIYI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetEase has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 24.95%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat NetEase's return on equity of 21.01%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NetEase has an analysts' consensus of $113.59 which suggests that it could grow by 23.1%. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 83.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetEase has a beta of 0.567, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.334%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. NetEase offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase pays out 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than NetEase quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than NetEase's net income of $913.2M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while NetEase's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.19x versus 4.06x for NetEase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.