SHMWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 2.63% compared to ShinMaywa Industries's net margin of 6.75%. ShinMaywa Industries's return on equity of 6.94% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.55%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than ShinMaywa Industries, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than ShinMaywa Industries.

ShinMaywa Industries has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.175%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. ShinMaywa Industries pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ShinMaywa Industries quarterly revenues are $368.4M, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. ShinMaywa Industries's net income of $9.7M is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, ShinMaywa Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ShinMaywa Industries is 0.33x versus 0.68x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a net margin of 2.63% compared to ShinMaywa Industries's net margin of 3.46%. ShinMaywa Industries's return on equity of 6.94% beat Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kawasaki Heavy Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ShinMaywa Industries has higher upside potential than Kawasaki Heavy Industries, analysts believe ShinMaywa Industries is more attractive than Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

ShinMaywa Industries has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.511%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. ShinMaywa Industries pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays out 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ShinMaywa Industries quarterly revenues are $368.4M, which are smaller than Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8B. ShinMaywa Industries's net income of $9.7M is lower than Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M. Notably, ShinMaywa Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Kawasaki Heavy Industries's PE ratio is 36.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ShinMaywa Industries is 0.33x versus 0.59x for Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 2.63% compared to ShinMaywa Industries's net margin of 7.38%. ShinMaywa Industries's return on equity of 6.94% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.05 which suggests that it could grow by 6.66%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than ShinMaywa Industries, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than ShinMaywa Industries.

ShinMaywa Industries has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.817%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ShinMaywa Industries pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ShinMaywa Industries quarterly revenues are $368.4M, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. ShinMaywa Industries's net income of $9.7M is lower than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, ShinMaywa Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ShinMaywa Industries is 0.33x versus 1.07x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 2.63% compared to ShinMaywa Industries's net margin of 5.34%. ShinMaywa Industries's return on equity of 6.94% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.69%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than ShinMaywa Industries, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than ShinMaywa Industries.

ShinMaywa Industries has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ShinMaywa Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ShinMaywa Industries pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ShinMaywa Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ShinMaywa Industries quarterly revenues are $368.4M, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. ShinMaywa Industries's net income of $9.7M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, ShinMaywa Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ShinMaywa Industries is 0.33x versus 2.32x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.