Will Palantir Crash?
AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…
Sell
38
PIAIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.11
Seasonality move
:
1.59%
Day range:
$6.11 - $6.11
52-week range:
$4.05 - $7.82
Dividend yield:
9.29%
P/E ratio:
6.87x
P/S ratio:
1.10x
P/B ratio:
0.86x
Volume:
4K
Avg. volume:
1.3K
1-year change:
30.56%
Market cap:
$111.3B
Revenue:
$103.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYU:DL
Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $11.55 |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
$6.11 | -- | $111.3B | 6.87x | $0.23 | 9.29% | 1.10x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$0.34 | -- | $3.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
BYU:DL
Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)
|
$0.18 | -- | $8.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$7.17 | $11.55 | $1.2B | 6.75x | $0.11 | 2.54% | 0.63x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
$7.99 | -- | $112.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.41x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
57.88% | 0.578 | 109.34% | 7.42x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-8.59% | 0.728 | 0.63% | 0.26x |
|
BYU:DL
Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)
|
-- | 3.959 | -- | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
32.45% | 1.188 | 43.67% | 0.81x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | 0.966 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
-- | -- | 4.42% | 9.08% | 25.36% | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$176.4K | -$706.2K | -86.81% | -90.72% | -63.06% | $355.7K |
|
BYU:DL
Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$167.6M | $64.5M | 8.49% | 12.65% | 17.27% | -- |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of -61.46%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B AIHSSenmiao Technology19.18% -$0.05 $2.3M -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or AIHS More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.524%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.29%. Senmiao Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues of $919.8K. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.87x while Senmiao Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.10x versus 0.58x for Senmiao Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.10x 6.87x $22.5B $3.7B AIHSSenmiao Technology0.58x -- $919.8K -$565.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or BYU:DL?
Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B BYU:DLBaiyu Holdings(DELISTED)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or BYU:DL?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED), analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 BYU:DLBaiyu Holdings(DELISTED)0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or BYU:DL More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.416%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or BYU:DL?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.29%. Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or BYU:DL?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED) quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.87x while Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.10x versus 0.04x for Baiyu Holdings(DELISTED). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.10x 6.87x $22.5B $3.7B BYU:DLBaiyu Holdings(DELISTED)0.04x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or DXF?
Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 DXFDunxin Financial Holdings0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or DXF More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.29%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.87x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.10x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.10x 6.87x $22.5B $3.7B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of 13.86%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B LXLexinFintech Holdings39.27% $0.33 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 61.05%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 LXLexinFintech Holdings4 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or LX More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.29%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.87x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.10x versus 0.63x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.10x 6.87x $22.5B $3.7B LXLexinFintech Holdings0.63x 6.75x $426.7M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or NCTY?
The9 has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat The9's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B NCTYThe9-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than The9.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 NCTYThe90 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or NCTY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.820, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.998%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.29%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.87x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.10x versus 2.41x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.10x 6.87x $22.5B $3.7B NCTYThe92.41x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?
Retail giant Target (NYSE:TGT) has been through an extremely volatile…
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
49
RGC alert for Jun 17
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Buy
75
ARQQ alert for Jun 17
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 6.36% over the past day.
Buy
59
SYM alert for Jun 17
Symbotic [SYM] is down 3.91% over the past day.
