PHKIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to Poly Property Group's net margin of --. Poly Property Group's return on equity of 2.64% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67%.

Poly Property Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Poly Property Group has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe Poly Property Group is more attractive than Sino Land.

Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.297%.

Poly Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Poly Property Group pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Poly Property Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. Poly Property Group's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, Poly Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.02x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Poly Property Group is 0.16x versus 7.52x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Poly Property Group's net margin of --. Poly Property Group's return on equity of 2.64% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 3.13%.

Poly Property Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Poly Property Group has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Poly Property Group is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.483%.

Poly Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Poly Property Group pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Poly Property Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Poly Property Group's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Poly Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.02x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Poly Property Group is 0.16x versus 2.96x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Poly Property Group's net margin of --. Poly Property Group's return on equity of 2.64% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of 2.55%.

Poly Property Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Poly Property Group has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe Poly Property Group is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.

Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.563%.

Poly Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 5.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Poly Property Group pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Poly Property Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. Poly Property Group's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, Poly Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.02x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Poly Property Group is 0.16x versus 1.61x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Poly Property Group's net margin of --. Poly Property Group's return on equity of 2.64% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

Poly Property Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Poly Property Group has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Poly Property Group is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.442, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.835%.

Poly Property Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Poly Property Group pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out 129.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wharf (Holdings)'s is not.

Poly Property Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Poly Property Group's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Poly Property Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.02x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Poly Property Group is 0.16x versus 3.55x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.