PHBBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CASI Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Pharmaron Beijing's net margin of -107.73%. Pharmaron Beijing's return on equity of -- beat CASI Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -137%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CASI Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 111.6%. Given that CASI Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Pharmaron Beijing, analysts believe CASI Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Pharmaron Beijing.

Pharmaron Beijing has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CASI Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.625%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. CASI Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CASI Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pharmaron Beijing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CASI Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $7.8M. Pharmaron Beijing's net income of -- is lower than CASI Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CASI Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing is 1.44x versus 1.02x for CASI Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Pharma Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Pharmaron Beijing's net margin of -101.61%. Pharmaron Beijing's return on equity of -- beat China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -66.27%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Pharma Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pharmaron Beijing has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holding, analysts believe Pharmaron Beijing is more attractive than China Pharma Holding.

Pharmaron Beijing has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.629%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. China Pharma Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Pharma Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pharmaron Beijing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Pharmaron Beijing's net income of -- is lower than China Pharma Holding's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Pharma Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing is 1.44x versus 0.87x for China Pharma Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinovac Biotech has a net margin of -- compared to Pharmaron Beijing's net margin of --. Pharmaron Beijing's return on equity of -- beat Sinovac Biotech's return on equity of -1.05%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinovac Biotech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pharmaron Beijing has higher upside potential than Sinovac Biotech, analysts believe Pharmaron Beijing is more attractive than Sinovac Biotech.

Pharmaron Beijing has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinovac Biotech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Sinovac Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinovac Biotech pays out -328.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pharmaron Beijing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinovac Biotech quarterly revenues of --. Pharmaron Beijing's net income of -- is lower than Sinovac Biotech's net income of --. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sinovac Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing is 1.44x versus 1.49x for Sinovac Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zai Lab has a net margin of -- compared to Pharmaron Beijing's net margin of -45.49%. Pharmaron Beijing's return on equity of -- beat Zai Lab's return on equity of -33.29%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zai Lab has an analysts' consensus of $54.59 which suggests that it could grow by 85.68%. Given that Zai Lab has higher upside potential than Pharmaron Beijing, analysts believe Zai Lab is more attractive than Pharmaron Beijing.

Pharmaron Beijing has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zai Lab has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.742%.

Pharmaron Beijing has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Zai Lab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zai Lab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pharmaron Beijing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zai Lab quarterly revenues of $106.5M. Pharmaron Beijing's net income of -- is lower than Zai Lab's net income of -$48.4M. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zai Lab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing is 1.44x versus 7.14x for Zai Lab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.