PEFDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Davis Commodities has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 15.49% beat Davis Commodities's return on equity of 4.72%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Davis Commodities has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than Davis Commodities, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than Davis Commodities.

Delfi has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Davis Commodities has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.73%. Davis Commodities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Delfi pays 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Davis Commodities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Davis Commodities quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Davis Commodities's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Davis Commodities's PE ratio is 70.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.67x versus 0.17x for Davis Commodities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fraser and Neave has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 15.49% beat Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fraser and Neave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than Fraser and Neave, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than Fraser and Neave.

Delfi has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.559%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.73%. Fraser and Neave offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Delfi pays 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave pays out 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Fraser and Neave's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Fraser and Neave's PE ratio is 14.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.67x versus 1.01x for Fraser and Neave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genius Group has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 15.49% beat Genius Group's return on equity of -15.41%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genius Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 788.89%. Given that Genius Group has higher upside potential than Delfi, analysts believe Genius Group is more attractive than Delfi.

Delfi has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genius Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.73%. Genius Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Delfi pays 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Genius Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genius Group quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Genius Group's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Genius Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.67x versus 0.39x for Genius Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wilmar International has a net margin of -- compared to Delfi's net margin of --. Delfi's return on equity of 15.49% beat Wilmar International's return on equity of 6.96%.

Delfi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wilmar International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Delfi has higher upside potential than Wilmar International, analysts believe Delfi is more attractive than Wilmar International.

Delfi has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wilmar International has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.623%.

Delfi has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.73%. Wilmar International offers a yield of 5.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Delfi pays 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Wilmar International pays out 52.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Delfi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wilmar International quarterly revenues of --. Delfi's net income of -- is lower than Wilmar International's net income of --. Notably, Delfi's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Wilmar International's PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Delfi is 0.67x versus 0.22x for Wilmar International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.