NTDOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Konami Group has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of 21.07%. Nintendo's return on equity of 17.1% beat Konami Group's return on equity of 17.52%.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Konami Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.68%. Given that Konami Group has higher upside potential than Nintendo, analysts believe Konami Group is more attractive than Nintendo.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Konami Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Konami Group offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Nintendo pays 48.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Konami Group pays out 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Konami Group quarterly revenues of $831M. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than Konami Group's net income of $175.1M. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.97x while Konami Group's PE ratio is 37.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 9.05x versus 7.01x for Konami Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of --. Nintendo's return on equity of 17.1% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nintendo pays 48.15% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nintendo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.97x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 9.05x versus 2.18x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sega Sammy Holdings has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of 10.28%. Nintendo's return on equity of 17.1% beat Sega Sammy Holdings's return on equity of 7.46%.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sega Sammy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than Sega Sammy Holdings, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than Sega Sammy Holdings.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sega Sammy Holdings has a beta of 0.058, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.243%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Sega Sammy Holdings offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Nintendo pays 48.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Sega Sammy Holdings pays out 41.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Sega Sammy Holdings quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than Sega Sammy Holdings's net income of $74.5M. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.97x while Sega Sammy Holdings's PE ratio is 24.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 9.05x versus 1.39x for Sega Sammy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Square Enix Holdings has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of 14.26%. Nintendo's return on equity of 17.1% beat Square Enix Holdings's return on equity of 6.61%.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Square Enix Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than Square Enix Holdings, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than Square Enix Holdings.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Square Enix Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.723%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Square Enix Holdings offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Nintendo pays 48.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Square Enix Holdings pays out 99.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Square Enix Holdings quarterly revenues of $596.1M. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than Square Enix Holdings's net income of $85M. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.97x while Square Enix Holdings's PE ratio is 49.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 9.05x versus 2.94x for Square Enix Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.