NPPXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of 7.02%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.179% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.564%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $574M. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 1.02x versus 1.63x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of 12.29%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.82%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than KDDI.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.179% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.095%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 1.02x versus 1.78x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.179% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 1.02x versus 2.73x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.179% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 1.02x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.