NETTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ZW Data Action Technologies has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of -59.09%. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat ZW Data Action Technologies's return on equity of -81.18%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies.

NetEase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.309%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. ZW Data Action Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than ZW Data Action Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2M. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is higher than ZW Data Action Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while ZW Data Action Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.65x versus 0.16x for ZW Data Action Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

36KR Holdings has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of --. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat 36KR Holdings's return on equity of -44.22%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 36KR Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3437.93%. Given that 36KR Holdings has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe 36KR Holdings is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36KR Holdings has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.523%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. 36KR Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. 36KR Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than 36KR Holdings quarterly revenues of --. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is higher than 36KR Holdings's net income of --. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while 36KR Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.65x versus 5.26x for 36KR Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WiMi Hologram Cloud has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of --. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat WiMi Hologram Cloud's return on equity of -44.29%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WiMi Hologram Cloud has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 533.48%. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WiMi Hologram Cloud has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. WiMi Hologram Cloud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. WiMi Hologram Cloud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than WiMi Hologram Cloud quarterly revenues of --. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is higher than WiMi Hologram Cloud's net income of --. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while WiMi Hologram Cloud's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.65x versus 1.21x for WiMi Hologram Cloud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.