MUEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Paul Mueller's net margin of -201.42%. Paul Mueller's return on equity of -- beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.96%.

Paul Mueller has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1718.18%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.157, which suggesting that the stock is 84.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 0.550, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.973%.

Paul Mueller has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paul Mueller quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $282K. Paul Mueller's net income of -- is lower than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$568K. Notably, Paul Mueller's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is 320.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller is -- versus 104.13x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Paul Mueller's net margin of --. Paul Mueller's return on equity of -- beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.

Paul Mueller has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Paul Mueller has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Paul Mueller is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.

Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.157, which suggesting that the stock is 84.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Paul Mueller has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 644.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Paul Mueller pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paul Mueller quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Paul Mueller's net income of -- is lower than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Paul Mueller's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller is -- versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of -- compared to Paul Mueller's net margin of 2.85%. Paul Mueller's return on equity of -- beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

Paul Mueller has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.96%. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.157, which suggesting that the stock is 84.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.422%.

Paul Mueller has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paul Mueller quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. Paul Mueller's net income of -- is lower than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Paul Mueller's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 63.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller is -- versus 1.90x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of -- compared to Paul Mueller's net margin of --. Paul Mueller's return on equity of -- beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Paul Mueller has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9900%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.157, which suggesting that the stock is 84.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.628%.

Paul Mueller has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Paul Mueller quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Paul Mueller's net income of -- is lower than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Paul Mueller's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller is -- versus 0.01x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.