MPNGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JD.com has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Meituan's net margin of 3.62%. Meituan's return on equity of 10.77% beat JD.com's return on equity of 15.07%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $52.44 which suggests that it could grow by 60.08%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.769%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $41.4B. Meituan's net income of $1.4B is lower than JD.com's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.78x while JD.com's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.98x versus 0.30x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MINISO Group Holding has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Meituan's net margin of 9.41%. Meituan's return on equity of 10.77% beat MINISO Group Holding's return on equity of 24.79%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MINISO Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of $22.96 which suggests that it could grow by 29.99%. Given that MINISO Group Holding has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe MINISO Group Holding is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MINISO Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MINISO Group Holding offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MINISO Group Holding pays out 47.54% of its earnings as a dividend. MINISO Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than MINISO Group Holding quarterly revenues of $608.5M. Meituan's net income of $1.4B is higher than MINISO Group Holding's net income of $57.2M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.78x while MINISO Group Holding's PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.98x versus 2.22x for MINISO Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Meituan's net margin of -57.26%. Meituan's return on equity of 10.77% beat NIO's return on equity of -161.56%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $4.77 which suggests that it could grow by 36.01%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.621, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.068%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Meituan's net income of $1.4B is higher than NIO's net income of -$947.2M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.78x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.98x versus 0.77x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.