Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…
Sell
17
KMAAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$122.20
Seasonality move
:
-1.2%
Day range:
$122.20 - $122.20
52-week range:
$122.20 - $191.27
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
98.56x
P/S ratio:
0.89x
P/B ratio:
1.59x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-36.11%
Market cap:
$626.1M
Revenue:
$713M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.73
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$8.6B | $0.49 | 5.26% | 20.41% | $52.15 |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
$122.20 | -- | $626.1M | 98.56x | $3.29 | 0% | 0.89x |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$58.36 | $52.15 | $106.7B | 26.05x | $1.03 | 1.76% | 3.28x |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
$78.13 | -- | $25.7B | 38.78x | $1.55 | 1.98% | 7.49x |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
$45.78 | -- | $27.2B | 20.07x | $1.96 | 4.28% | 0.94x |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
$10.34 | -- | $19.1B | 26.06x | $0.39 | 3.73% | 2.77x |
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
$346.75 | -- | $37.2B | 34.40x | $6.78 | 1.96% | 3.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
33.32% | -1.298 | 31.31% | 1.47x |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
36.65% | 0.849 | 10.08% | 0.88x |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
50.35% | -0.363 | 7.88% | 0.87x |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
9.15% | 0.037 | 1.21% | 0.88x |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | 0.011 | -- | -- |
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | -0.614 | -- | 0.39x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -0.6% | -0.87% | -- | -- |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$3.3B | $1.4B | 19.11% | 28.88% | 20.61% | $489M |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
-- | -- | 22.31% | 46.4% | -- | -- |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
$2.5B | $446.9M | 36.14% | 39.49% | 6.56% | $363.5M |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | $365.7M | 20.94% | 21.17% | 12.04% | $600.3M |
Komax Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or ABBNY?
ABB has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 13.89%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat ABB's return on equity of 28.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $591.4M ABBNYABB41.73% $0.60 $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or ABBNY?
Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABB has an analysts' consensus of $52.15 which suggests that it could fall by -10.64%. Given that ABB has higher upside potential than Komax Holding AG, analysts believe ABB is more attractive than Komax Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 ABBNYABB1 4 0 -
Is KMAAF or ABBNY More Risky?
Komax Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABB has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.222%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or ABBNY?
Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ABB offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. ABB pays out 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. ABB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or ABBNY?
Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ABB quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than ABB's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while ABB's PE ratio is 26.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 3.28x for ABB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.89x 98.56x -- -- ABBNYABB3.28x 26.05x $7.9B $1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or GBERY?
Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $591.4M GBERYGeberit AG-- -- $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or GBERY?
Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 GBERYGeberit AG0 0 0 -
Is KMAAF or GBERY More Risky?
Komax Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.69%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or GBERY?
Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 70.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or GBERY?
Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 38.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 7.49x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.89x 98.56x -- -- GBERYGeberit AG7.49x 38.78x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or KHNGY?
Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 4.6%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 39.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $591.4M KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG35.34% $0.54 $3.6B -
What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or KHNGY?
Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG0 0 0 -
Is KMAAF or KHNGY More Risky?
Komax Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.277%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or KHNGY?
Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.96 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 100.09% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or KHNGY?
Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $323.5M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 0.94x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.89x 98.56x -- -- KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG0.94x 20.07x $7B $323.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or SGSOY?
SGS AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $591.4M SGSOYSGS AG-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or SGSOY?
Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 SGSOYSGS AG0 0 0 -
Is KMAAF or SGSOY More Risky?
Komax Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.22%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or SGSOY?
Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or SGSOY?
Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 2.77x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.89x 98.56x -- -- SGSOYSGS AG2.77x 26.06x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or SHLRF?
Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 9.41%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $591.4M SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.51 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or SHLRF?
Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is KMAAF or SHLRF More Risky?
Komax Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.770, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.969%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or SHLRF?
Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or SHLRF?
Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $285.7M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 34.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 3.11x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.89x 98.56x -- -- SHLRFSchindler Holding AG3.11x 34.40x $3B $285.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Gamestop’s Bitcoin Strategy Going To Succeed?
When GameStop (NYSE: GME) announced in Q1 that its board had…
How High Will Roku Stock Go?
Streaming software and hardware maker Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) has seen its…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 14
VEON [VEON] is down 18.57% over the past day.
Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 14
Dave [DAVE] is down 12.68% over the past day.
Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 14
Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 9.12% over the past day.
