KKPNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Koninklijke KPN NV's net margin of -205.43%. Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -12.93%.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $52.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.4%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Koninklijke KPN NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Koninklijke KPN NV.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.957%.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koninklijke KPN NV pays 76.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $55.3M. Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M is higher than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$113.6M. Notably, Koninklijke KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke KPN NV is 3.22x versus 55.05x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasus Tel has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Koninklijke KPN NV's net margin of --. Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96% beat Pegasus Tel's return on equity of --.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pegasus Tel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Pegasus Tel, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Pegasus Tel.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasus Tel has a beta of -2.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 337.213%.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Pegasus Tel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koninklijke KPN NV pays 76.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasus Tel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Pegasus Tel quarterly revenues of --. Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M is higher than Pegasus Tel's net income of --. Notably, Koninklijke KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Pegasus Tel's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke KPN NV is 3.22x versus 1,750.79x for Pegasus Tel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Koninklijke KPN NV's net margin of --. Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 57.01%.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Koninklijke KPN NV pays 76.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 44.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M is higher than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Koninklijke KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.68x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 26.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke KPN NV is 3.22x versus 4.65x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.