Financhill
Buy
93

IVBXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.81
Seasonality move :
20%
Day range:
$7.81 - $7.81
52-week range:
$3.91 - $7.95
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
9.70x
P/B ratio:
7.12x
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
182
1-year change:
73.86%
Market cap:
$12.8B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IVBXF
Innovent Biologics
-- -- -- -- --
ADAG
Adagene
-- -$0.51 -- -- $5.75
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals
-- -- 57.7% -- $4.00
CPHI
China Pharma Holding
-- -- -- -- --
SVA
Sinovac Biotech
-- -- -- -- --
ZLAB
Zai Lab
$152.8M -$0.31 25.92% -47.75% $55.34
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IVBXF
Innovent Biologics
$7.81 -- $12.8B -- $0.00 0% 9.70x
ADAG
Adagene
$1.94 $5.75 $91.4M -- $0.00 0% 4.30x
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals
$1.89 $4.00 $29.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.96x
CPHI
China Pharma Holding
$1.60 -- $5.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.83x
SVA
Sinovac Biotech
$6.47 -- $464.9M -- $55.00 0% 1.49x
ZLAB
Zai Lab
$30.14 $55.34 $3.3B -- $0.00 0% 7.32x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IVBXF
Innovent Biologics
17.68% -0.343 5.27% 2.16x
ADAG
Adagene
26.49% 1.280 19.42% 2.23x
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals
177.43% 2.519 55.26% 0.60x
CPHI
China Pharma Holding
33.34% -2.984 40.63% 0.15x
SVA
Sinovac Biotech
3.46% 0.000 12.91% 11.22x
ZLAB
Zai Lab
17.62% -0.232 4.43% 2.64x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IVBXF
Innovent Biologics
-- -- -0.6% -0.75% -- --
ADAG
Adagene
-- -- -42.07% -56.44% -- --
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals
$3.6M -$10.2M -161.7% -630.22% -169.12% --
CPHI
China Pharma Holding
-$136.1K -$758.6K -40.78% -61.79% -66.67% -$138.8K
SVA
Sinovac Biotech
-- -- -1.02% -1.05% -- --
ZLAB
Zai Lab
$67.8M -$56.3M -29.16% -33.29% -44.37% -$65.6M

Innovent Biologics vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IVBXF or ADAG?

    Adagene has a net margin of -- compared to Innovent Biologics's net margin of --. Innovent Biologics's return on equity of -0.75% beat Adagene's return on equity of -56.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    -- -- $2.2B
    ADAG
    Adagene
    -- -- $68.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVBXF or ADAG?

    Innovent Biologics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Adagene has an analysts' consensus of $5.75 which suggests that it could grow by 196.39%. Given that Adagene has higher upside potential than Innovent Biologics, analysts believe Adagene is more attractive than Innovent Biologics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    0 0 0
    ADAG
    Adagene
    0 2 0
  • Is IVBXF or ADAG More Risky?

    Innovent Biologics has a beta of -0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 128.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVBXF or ADAG?

    Innovent Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovent Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVBXF or ADAG?

    Innovent Biologics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Adagene quarterly revenues of --. Innovent Biologics's net income of -- is lower than Adagene's net income of --. Notably, Innovent Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Adagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovent Biologics is 9.70x versus 4.30x for Adagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    9.70x -- -- --
    ADAG
    Adagene
    4.30x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IVBXF or CASI?

    CASI Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Innovent Biologics's net margin of -172.28%. Innovent Biologics's return on equity of -0.75% beat CASI Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -630.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    -- -- $2.2B
    CASI
    CASI Pharmaceuticals
    58% -$0.69 $10.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVBXF or CASI?

    Innovent Biologics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CASI Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 111.64%. Given that CASI Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Innovent Biologics, analysts believe CASI Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Innovent Biologics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    0 0 0
    CASI
    CASI Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
  • Is IVBXF or CASI More Risky?

    Innovent Biologics has a beta of -0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 128.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CASI Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.625%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVBXF or CASI?

    Innovent Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CASI Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovent Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CASI Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVBXF or CASI?

    Innovent Biologics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CASI Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Innovent Biologics's net income of -- is lower than CASI Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Innovent Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CASI Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovent Biologics is 9.70x versus 0.96x for CASI Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    9.70x -- -- --
    CASI
    CASI Pharmaceuticals
    0.96x -- $6.2M -$10.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns IVBXF or CPHI?

    China Pharma Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Innovent Biologics's net margin of -69.14%. Innovent Biologics's return on equity of -0.75% beat China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -61.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    -- -- $2.2B
    CPHI
    China Pharma Holding
    -11.97% -$0.24 $10.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVBXF or CPHI?

    Innovent Biologics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Pharma Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innovent Biologics has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holding, analysts believe Innovent Biologics is more attractive than China Pharma Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    0 0 0
    CPHI
    China Pharma Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is IVBXF or CPHI More Risky?

    Innovent Biologics has a beta of -0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 128.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.629%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVBXF or CPHI?

    Innovent Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Pharma Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovent Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Pharma Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVBXF or CPHI?

    Innovent Biologics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Innovent Biologics's net income of -- is lower than China Pharma Holding's net income of -$785.6K. Notably, Innovent Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Pharma Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovent Biologics is 9.70x versus 0.83x for China Pharma Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    9.70x -- -- --
    CPHI
    China Pharma Holding
    0.83x -- $1.1M -$785.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns IVBXF or SVA?

    Sinovac Biotech has a net margin of -- compared to Innovent Biologics's net margin of --. Innovent Biologics's return on equity of -0.75% beat Sinovac Biotech's return on equity of -1.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    -- -- $2.2B
    SVA
    Sinovac Biotech
    -- -- $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About IVBXF or SVA?

    Innovent Biologics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinovac Biotech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innovent Biologics has higher upside potential than Sinovac Biotech, analysts believe Innovent Biologics is more attractive than Sinovac Biotech.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    0 0 0
    SVA
    Sinovac Biotech
    0 0 0
  • Is IVBXF or SVA More Risky?

    Innovent Biologics has a beta of -0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 128.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinovac Biotech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVBXF or SVA?

    Innovent Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinovac Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $55.00 per share. Innovent Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinovac Biotech pays out -328.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVBXF or SVA?

    Innovent Biologics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinovac Biotech quarterly revenues of --. Innovent Biologics's net income of -- is lower than Sinovac Biotech's net income of --. Notably, Innovent Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sinovac Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovent Biologics is 9.70x versus 1.49x for Sinovac Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    9.70x -- -- --
    SVA
    Sinovac Biotech
    1.49x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IVBXF or ZLAB?

    Zai Lab has a net margin of -- compared to Innovent Biologics's net margin of -45.49%. Innovent Biologics's return on equity of -0.75% beat Zai Lab's return on equity of -33.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    -- -- $2.2B
    ZLAB
    Zai Lab
    63.71% -$0.40 $984.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVBXF or ZLAB?

    Innovent Biologics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zai Lab has an analysts' consensus of $55.34 which suggests that it could grow by 83.61%. Given that Zai Lab has higher upside potential than Innovent Biologics, analysts believe Zai Lab is more attractive than Innovent Biologics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    0 0 0
    ZLAB
    Zai Lab
    7 1 0
  • Is IVBXF or ZLAB More Risky?

    Innovent Biologics has a beta of -0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 128.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zai Lab has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.742%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVBXF or ZLAB?

    Innovent Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zai Lab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovent Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zai Lab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVBXF or ZLAB?

    Innovent Biologics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zai Lab quarterly revenues of $106.5M. Innovent Biologics's net income of -- is lower than Zai Lab's net income of -$48.4M. Notably, Innovent Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zai Lab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovent Biologics is 9.70x versus 7.32x for Zai Lab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVBXF
    Innovent Biologics
    9.70x -- -- --
    ZLAB
    Zai Lab
    7.32x -- $106.5M -$48.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Best AI Index Fund to Buy

Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…

Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock