Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Sell
41
FSUGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.98
Seasonality move
:
9.79%
Day range:
$23.85 - $24.23
52-week range:
$21.11 - $39.32
Dividend yield:
11.01%
P/E ratio:
6.24x
P/S ratio:
2.04x
P/B ratio:
1.89x
Volume:
78.1K
Avg. volume:
131K
1-year change:
-31.29%
Market cap:
$36.9B
Revenue:
$18.1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.69
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $53.80 |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue
|
$23.98 | -- | $36.9B | 6.24x | $1.23 | 11.01% | 2.04x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$50.09 | $53.80 | $127B | 15.70x | $1.48 | 5.83% | 2.28x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
$0.06 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.89x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$11.39 | -- | $52.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.11 | -- | $40.5M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 175.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue
|
19% | 0.193 | 10.4% | 2.07x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
28.87% | 0.717 | 11.7% | 1.27x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
9.38% | -0.398 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
38.76% | 0.000 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -0.182 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue
|
-- | -- | 23.87% | 29.95% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 16.54% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fortescue vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue-- -- $24.1B BHPBHP Group-- -- $66.7B -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or BHP?
Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $53.80 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Fortescue, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Fortescue.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is FSUGY or BHP More Risky?
Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.848%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or BHP?
Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or BHP?
Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while BHP Group's PE ratio is 15.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.04x versus 2.28x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue2.04x 6.24x -- -- BHPBHP Group2.28x 15.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue-- -- $24.1B FTZZFFertoz-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Fertoz.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue0 0 0 FTZZFFertoz0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or FTZZF More Risky?
Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.04x versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue2.04x 6.24x -- -- FTZZFFertoz1.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue-- -- $24.1B HMIFFHarvest Minerals-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or HMIFF?
Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or HMIFF More Risky?
Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or HMIFF?
Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or HMIFF?
Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.04x versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue2.04x 6.24x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals4.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or NVA?
Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue-- -- $24.1B NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or NVA?
Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 119.41%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Fortescue, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Fortescue.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue0 0 0 NVANova Minerals0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or NVA More Risky?
Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or NVA?
Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or NVA?
Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.04x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue2.04x 6.24x -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue-- -- $24.1B SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or SBMSF More Risky?
Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.426%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Danakali offers a yield of 175.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 2.04x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue2.04x 6.24x -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 47.38x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
