Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Sell
34
EAWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0000
Seasonality move
:
17.96%
Day range:
$0.0045 - $0.0057
52-week range:
$0.0012 - $0.1089
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
543.5K
Avg. volume:
1.5M
1-year change:
-94%
Market cap:
$1.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$428.7M | $0.63 | -0.15% | 25.03% | $47.57 |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
$0.0045 | -- | $1.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$42.21 | $47.57 | $3.5B | 19.63x | $0.05 | 0.24% | 2.12x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
$0.0083 | -- | $73.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
$0.0095 | -- | $1.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
$305.00 | -- | $304.6M | -- | $10.00 | 3.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -9.258 | -- | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
72.94% | 1.718 | 19.05% | 1.23x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | 3.547 | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -5.649 | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | 0.014 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -$492.7K | -- | -- | -- | -$177.3K |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$111.3M | $55.1M | 24.82% | 141.7% | 15.88% | $54.3M |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Energy And Water Development vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EAWD or ATMU?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Energy And Water Development's net margin of 10.85%. Energy And Water Development's return on equity of -- beat Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M -
What do Analysts Say About EAWD or ATMU?
Energy And Water Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atmus Filtration Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $47.57 which suggests that it could grow by 12.7%. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies3 1 0 -
Is EAWD or ATMU More Risky?
Energy And Water Development has a beta of -380.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38138.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAWD or ATMU?
Energy And Water Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atmus Filtration Technologies offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Energy And Water Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EAWD or ATMU?
Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues of $403.7M. Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K is lower than Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M. Notably, Energy And Water Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Atmus Filtration Technologies's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy And Water Development is -- versus 2.12x for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies2.12x 19.63x $403.7M $43.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns EAWD or DGWR?
Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a net margin of -- compared to Energy And Water Development's net margin of --. Energy And Water Development's return on equity of -- beat Deep Green Waste & Recycling's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EAWD or DGWR?
Energy And Water Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deep Green Waste & Recycling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy And Water Development has higher upside potential than Deep Green Waste & Recycling, analysts believe Energy And Water Development is more attractive than Deep Green Waste & Recycling.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0 0 0 -
Is EAWD or DGWR More Risky?
Energy And Water Development has a beta of -380.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38138.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.202%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAWD or DGWR?
Energy And Water Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deep Green Waste & Recycling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy And Water Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deep Green Waste & Recycling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EAWD or DGWR?
Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Deep Green Waste & Recycling quarterly revenues of --. Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K is higher than Deep Green Waste & Recycling's net income of --. Notably, Energy And Water Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deep Green Waste & Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy And Water Development is -- versus 0.02x for Deep Green Waste & Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0.02x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EAWD or LQWC?
LifeQuest World has a net margin of -- compared to Energy And Water Development's net margin of --. Energy And Water Development's return on equity of -- beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EAWD or LQWC?
Energy And Water Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy And Water Development has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Energy And Water Development is more attractive than LifeQuest World.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 -
Is EAWD or LQWC More Risky?
Energy And Water Development has a beta of -380.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38138.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAWD or LQWC?
Energy And Water Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy And Water Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EAWD or LQWC?
Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K is higher than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, Energy And Water Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy And Water Development is -- versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EAWD or RAIN?
Rain Oncology has a net margin of -- compared to Energy And Water Development's net margin of --. Energy And Water Development's return on equity of -- beat Rain Oncology's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- RAINRain Oncology-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EAWD or RAIN?
Energy And Water Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rain Oncology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy And Water Development has higher upside potential than Rain Oncology, analysts believe Energy And Water Development is more attractive than Rain Oncology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 RAINRain Oncology0 0 0 -
Is EAWD or RAIN More Risky?
Energy And Water Development has a beta of -380.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38138.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rain Oncology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAWD or RAIN?
Energy And Water Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rain Oncology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy And Water Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rain Oncology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EAWD or RAIN?
Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rain Oncology quarterly revenues of --. Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K is higher than Rain Oncology's net income of --. Notably, Energy And Water Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rain Oncology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy And Water Development is -- versus -- for Rain Oncology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K RAINRain Oncology-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EAWD or SCPJ?
Scope Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Energy And Water Development's net margin of --. Energy And Water Development's return on equity of -- beat Scope Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EAWD or SCPJ?
Energy And Water Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scope Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy And Water Development has higher upside potential than Scope Industries, analysts believe Energy And Water Development is more attractive than Scope Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 SCPJScope Industries0 0 0 -
Is EAWD or SCPJ More Risky?
Energy And Water Development has a beta of -380.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38138.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scope Industries has a beta of 0.370, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.029%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAWD or SCPJ?
Energy And Water Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scope Industries offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Energy And Water Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scope Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EAWD or SCPJ?
Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Scope Industries quarterly revenues of --. Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K is higher than Scope Industries's net income of --. Notably, Energy And Water Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scope Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy And Water Development is -- versus -- for Scope Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
