CTRYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fangdd Network Group has a net margin of -- compared to Country Garden Holdings's net margin of --. Country Garden Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Fangdd Network Group's return on equity of --.

Country Garden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fangdd Network Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Country Garden Holdings has higher upside potential than Fangdd Network Group, analysts believe Country Garden Holdings is more attractive than Fangdd Network Group.

Country Garden Holdings has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fangdd Network Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Country Garden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fangdd Network Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Country Garden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fangdd Network Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Country Garden Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fangdd Network Group quarterly revenues of --. Country Garden Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Fangdd Network Group's net income of --. Notably, Country Garden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fangdd Network Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Country Garden Holdings is 0.04x versus -- for Fangdd Network Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ucommune International has a net margin of -- compared to Country Garden Holdings's net margin of --. Country Garden Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07%.

Country Garden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucommune International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Country Garden Holdings has higher upside potential than Ucommune International, analysts believe Country Garden Holdings is more attractive than Ucommune International.

Country Garden Holdings has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucommune International has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.584%.

Country Garden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ucommune International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Country Garden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ucommune International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Country Garden Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ucommune International quarterly revenues of --. Country Garden Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Ucommune International's net income of --. Notably, Country Garden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ucommune International's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Country Garden Holdings is 0.04x versus 0.05x for Ucommune International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wetouch Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Country Garden Holdings's net margin of 23.06%. Country Garden Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Wetouch Technology's return on equity of 3.23%.

Country Garden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wetouch Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Country Garden Holdings has higher upside potential than Wetouch Technology, analysts believe Country Garden Holdings is more attractive than Wetouch Technology.

Country Garden Holdings has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wetouch Technology has a beta of -0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.157%.

Country Garden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wetouch Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Country Garden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wetouch Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Country Garden Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wetouch Technology quarterly revenues of $11.5M. Country Garden Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Wetouch Technology's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Country Garden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wetouch Technology's PE ratio is 5.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Country Garden Holdings is 0.04x versus 0.28x for Wetouch Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xinyuan Real Estate has a net margin of -- compared to Country Garden Holdings's net margin of --. Country Garden Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Xinyuan Real Estate's return on equity of --.

Country Garden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyuan Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2571.64%. Given that Xinyuan Real Estate has higher upside potential than Country Garden Holdings, analysts believe Xinyuan Real Estate is more attractive than Country Garden Holdings.

Country Garden Holdings has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyuan Real Estate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.969%.

Country Garden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xinyuan Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Country Garden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyuan Real Estate pays out -6.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Country Garden Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xinyuan Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Country Garden Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Xinyuan Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Country Garden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xinyuan Real Estate's PE ratio is 0.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Country Garden Holdings is 0.04x versus 0.03x for Xinyuan Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.