Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Buy
71
CIMDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.65
Seasonality move
:
-2.92%
Day range:
$1.65 - $1.65
52-week range:
$1.30 - $1.90
Dividend yield:
5.19%
P/E ratio:
10.76x
P/S ratio:
3.70x
P/B ratio:
1.09x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2.7K
1-year change:
26.92%
Market cap:
$17.7B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.15
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CIMDF
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUJA
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUET
DUET Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVGR
Evergreen
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLYBY
Malayan Banking Bhd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TETE
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CIMDF
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd
|
$1.65 | -- | $17.7B | 10.76x | $0.06 | 5.19% | 3.70x |
|
BUJA
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
|
$11.20 | -- | $55.3M | 19.81x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DUET
DUET Acquisition
|
$11.33 | -- | $44.4M | 395.04x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EVGR
Evergreen
|
$11.87 | -- | $95.8M | 42.39x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MLYBY
Malayan Banking Bhd
|
$5.73 | -- | $34.6B | 16.16x | $0.14 | 4.66% | 5.88x |
|
TETE
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition
|
$12.28 | -- | $73.4M | 939.92x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CIMDF
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd
|
37.61% | 0.062 | 68.53% | 4.75x |
|
BUJA
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
|
-- | -0.060 | -- | -- |
|
DUET
DUET Acquisition
|
-- | 0.050 | -- | -- |
|
EVGR
Evergreen
|
-- | -0.024 | -- | -- |
|
MLYBY
Malayan Banking Bhd
|
34.98% | -1.376 | 41.56% | 8.34x |
|
TETE
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition
|
-- | -0.077 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CIMDF
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd
|
-- | -- | 7.05% | 10.81% | 115.06% | $39.1M |
|
BUJA
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
|
-- | -$444.5K | -- | -- | -- | -$401.7K |
|
DUET
DUET Acquisition
|
-- | -$97.7K | -- | -- | -- | -$35K |
|
EVGR
Evergreen
|
-- | -$156K | -- | -- | -- | -$133.4K |
|
MLYBY
Malayan Banking Bhd
|
-- | -- | 6.53% | 10.17% | 123.75% | $3.1B |
|
TETE
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition
|
-- | -$208K | -- | -- | -- | -$163.7K |
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CIMDF or BUJA?
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 has a net margin of 35.89% compared to CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net margin of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's return on equity of 10.81% beat Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd-- $0.04 $26.4B BUJABukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CIMDF or BUJA?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has higher upside potential than Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1, analysts believe CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is more attractive than Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd0 0 0 BUJABukit Jalil Global Acquisition 10 0 0 -
Is CIMDF or BUJA More Risky?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CIMDF or BUJA?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.19%. Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd pays 46.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CIMDF or BUJA?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1 quarterly revenues of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net income of $456.1M is higher than Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1's net income of -$320. Notably, CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is 3.70x versus -- for Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd3.70x 10.76x $1.3B $456.1M BUJABukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1-- 19.81x -- -$320
-
Which has Higher Returns CIMDF or DUET?
DUET Acquisition has a net margin of 35.89% compared to CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net margin of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's return on equity of 10.81% beat DUET Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd-- $0.04 $26.4B DUETDUET Acquisition-- -$0.05 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CIMDF or DUET?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DUET Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has higher upside potential than DUET Acquisition, analysts believe CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is more attractive than DUET Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd0 0 0 DUETDUET Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is CIMDF or DUET More Risky?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DUET Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CIMDF or DUET?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.19%. DUET Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd pays 46.6% of its earnings as a dividend. DUET Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CIMDF or DUET?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than DUET Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net income of $456.1M is higher than DUET Acquisition's net income of -$151.3K. Notably, CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while DUET Acquisition's PE ratio is 395.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is 3.70x versus -- for DUET Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd3.70x 10.76x $1.3B $456.1M DUETDUET Acquisition-- 395.04x -- -$151.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns CIMDF or EVGR?
Evergreen has a net margin of 35.89% compared to CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net margin of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's return on equity of 10.81% beat Evergreen's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd-- $0.04 $26.4B EVGREvergreen-- $0.07 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CIMDF or EVGR?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evergreen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has higher upside potential than Evergreen, analysts believe CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is more attractive than Evergreen.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd0 0 0 EVGREvergreen0 0 0 -
Is CIMDF or EVGR More Risky?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CIMDF or EVGR?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.19%. Evergreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd pays 46.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CIMDF or EVGR?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Evergreen quarterly revenues of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net income of $456.1M is higher than Evergreen's net income of $544.1K. Notably, CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Evergreen's PE ratio is 42.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is 3.70x versus -- for Evergreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd3.70x 10.76x $1.3B $456.1M EVGREvergreen-- 42.39x -- $544.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns CIMDF or MLYBY?
Malayan Banking Bhd has a net margin of 35.89% compared to CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net margin of 37.24%. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's return on equity of 10.81% beat Malayan Banking Bhd's return on equity of 10.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd-- $0.04 $26.4B MLYBYMalayan Banking Bhd-- $0.09 $34.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CIMDF or MLYBY?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Malayan Banking Bhd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has higher upside potential than Malayan Banking Bhd, analysts believe CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is more attractive than Malayan Banking Bhd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd0 0 0 MLYBYMalayan Banking Bhd0 0 0 -
Is CIMDF or MLYBY More Risky?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malayan Banking Bhd has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.821%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CIMDF or MLYBY?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.19%. Malayan Banking Bhd offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd pays 46.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Malayan Banking Bhd pays out 76.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CIMDF or MLYBY?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Malayan Banking Bhd quarterly revenues of $1.5B. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net income of $456.1M is lower than Malayan Banking Bhd's net income of $570.2M. Notably, CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Malayan Banking Bhd's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is 3.70x versus 5.88x for Malayan Banking Bhd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd3.70x 10.76x $1.3B $456.1M MLYBYMalayan Banking Bhd5.88x 16.16x $1.5B $570.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CIMDF or TETE?
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition has a net margin of 35.89% compared to CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net margin of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's return on equity of 10.81% beat Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd-- $0.04 $26.4B TETETechnology & Telecommunication Acquisition-- $0.03 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CIMDF or TETE?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has higher upside potential than Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition, analysts believe CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is more attractive than Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd0 0 0 TETETechnology & Telecommunication Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is CIMDF or TETE More Risky?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a beta of 0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 58.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CIMDF or TETE?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.19%. Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd pays 46.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CIMDF or TETE?
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's net income of $456.1M is higher than Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition's net income of $200.5K. Notably, CIMB Group Holdings Bhd's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition's PE ratio is 939.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is 3.70x versus -- for Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CIMDFCIMB Group Holdings Bhd3.70x 10.76x $1.3B $456.1M TETETechnology & Telecommunication Acquisition-- 939.92x -- $200.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
