CICHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baiyu Holdings has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 9.52%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat Baiyu Holdings's return on equity of 2.72%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baiyu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Baiyu Holdings, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Baiyu Holdings.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.029, which suggesting that the stock is 97.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baiyu Holdings has a beta of 0.335, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.46%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Baiyu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Baiyu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than Baiyu Holdings quarterly revenues of $37.2M. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than Baiyu Holdings's net income of $3.5M. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while Baiyu Holdings's PE ratio is 0.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.09x versus 0.04x for Baiyu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.029, which suggesting that the stock is 97.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.09x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 8.45%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could fall by -30.34%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than China Construction Bank, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than China Construction Bank.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.029, which suggesting that the stock is 97.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.594, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.551%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $511.5M. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.09x versus 0.78x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat The9's return on equity of --.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than The9.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.029, which suggesting that the stock is 97.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.682%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.09x versus 1.88x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.