AYALY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cebu Air has a net margin of 15.32% compared to Ayala's net margin of -0.75%. Ayala's return on equity of 5.69% beat Cebu Air's return on equity of 104.15%.

Ayala has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cebu Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ayala has higher upside potential than Cebu Air, analysts believe Ayala is more attractive than Cebu Air.

Ayala has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cebu Air has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.08%.

Ayala has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Cebu Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ayala pays 24.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Cebu Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ayala's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ayala quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Cebu Air quarterly revenues of $403.4M. Ayala's net income of $204M is higher than Cebu Air's net income of -$3M. Notably, Ayala's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while Cebu Air's PE ratio is 0.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ayala is 1.07x versus 0.01x for Cebu Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DMCI Holdings has a net margin of 15.32% compared to Ayala's net margin of 18.3%. Ayala's return on equity of 5.69% beat DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36%.

Ayala has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DMCI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ayala has higher upside potential than DMCI Holdings, analysts believe Ayala is more attractive than DMCI Holdings.

Ayala has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.112%.

Ayala has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. DMCI Holdings offers a yield of 12.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ayala pays 24.54% of its earnings as a dividend. DMCI Holdings pays out 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ayala quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues of $381.7M. Ayala's net income of $204M is higher than DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M. Notably, Ayala's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while DMCI Holdings's PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ayala is 1.07x versus 1.15x for DMCI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JG Summit Holdings has a net margin of 15.32% compared to Ayala's net margin of 3.43%. Ayala's return on equity of 5.69% beat JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95%.

Ayala has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JG Summit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ayala has higher upside potential than JG Summit Holdings, analysts believe Ayala is more attractive than JG Summit Holdings.

Ayala has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.622%.

Ayala has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. JG Summit Holdings offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ayala pays 24.54% of its earnings as a dividend. JG Summit Holdings pays out 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ayala quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ayala's net income of $204M is higher than JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M. Notably, Ayala's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while JG Summit Holdings's PE ratio is 12.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ayala is 1.07x versus 0.74x for JG Summit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

San Miguel has a net margin of 15.32% compared to Ayala's net margin of 3.5%. Ayala's return on equity of 5.69% beat San Miguel's return on equity of 0.77%.

Ayala has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand San Miguel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ayala has higher upside potential than San Miguel, analysts believe Ayala is more attractive than San Miguel.

Ayala has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison San Miguel has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.677%.

Ayala has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. San Miguel offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ayala pays 24.54% of its earnings as a dividend. San Miguel pays out 4567.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Ayala's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but San Miguel's is not.

Ayala quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than San Miguel quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Ayala's net income of $204M is lower than San Miguel's net income of $239M. Notably, Ayala's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while San Miguel's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ayala is 1.07x versus 0.13x for San Miguel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.