ATZAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of 10.16% compared to Aritzia's net margin of -3.99%. Aritzia's return on equity of 15.59% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.87%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.06%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Aritzia, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.408% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 2.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.383%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $529.7M, which are larger than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $179.1M. Aritzia's net income of $53.8M is higher than Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.34x while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.93x versus 0.29x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 10.16% compared to Aritzia's net margin of 9.64%. Aritzia's return on equity of 15.59% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.87%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $168.39 which suggests that it could grow by 10.97%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Aritzia, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.408% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.503%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $529.7M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Aritzia's net income of $53.8M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.34x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.93x versus 2.38x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 10.16% compared to Aritzia's net margin of 7.56%. Aritzia's return on equity of 15.59% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.87%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $47.69 which suggests that it could fall by -16.27%. Given that Aritzia has more downside risk than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Urban Outfitters is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.408% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.402%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $529.7M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Aritzia's net income of $53.8M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.34x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 16.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.93x versus 1.00x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zumiez has a net margin of 10.16% compared to Aritzia's net margin of 0.52%. Aritzia's return on equity of 15.59% beat Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.87%. On the other hand Zumiez has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.93%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Aritzia, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.408% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zumiez has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.874%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zumiez offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zumiez pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $529.7M, which are larger than Zumiez quarterly revenues of $222.5M. Aritzia's net income of $53.8M is higher than Zumiez's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.34x while Zumiez's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.93x versus 0.41x for Zumiez. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.