ASMVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canaan has a net margin of 0.13% compared to ASMPT's net margin of -104.66%. ASMPT's return on equity of 4.56% beat Canaan's return on equity of -72.6%.

ASMPT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canaan has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 383.85%. Given that Canaan has higher upside potential than ASMPT, analysts believe Canaan is more attractive than ASMPT.

ASMPT has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canaan has a beta of 3.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.598%.

ASMPT has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Canaan offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASMPT pays 135.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Canaan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASMPT quarterly revenues are $437.7M, which are larger than Canaan quarterly revenues of $88.8M. ASMPT's net income of $564.3K is higher than Canaan's net income of -$92.9M. Notably, ASMPT's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Canaan's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASMPT is 2.77x versus 0.84x for Canaan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of 0.13% compared to ASMPT's net margin of 4.11%. ASMPT's return on equity of 4.56% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.92%.

ASMPT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 99.48%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than ASMPT, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than ASMPT.

ASMPT has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.700, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.048%.

ASMPT has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASMPT pays 135.66% of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASMPT quarterly revenues are $437.7M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $36.6M. ASMPT's net income of $564.3K is lower than inTest's net income of $1.5M. Notably, ASMPT's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while inTest's PE ratio is 27.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASMPT is 2.77x versus 0.59x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maxeon Solar Technologies has a net margin of 0.13% compared to ASMPT's net margin of -444.83%. ASMPT's return on equity of 4.56% beat Maxeon Solar Technologies's return on equity of -498.77%.

ASMPT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maxeon Solar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 463.38%. Given that Maxeon Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than ASMPT, analysts believe Maxeon Solar Technologies is more attractive than ASMPT.

ASMPT has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maxeon Solar Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ASMPT has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Maxeon Solar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASMPT pays 135.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Maxeon Solar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASMPT quarterly revenues are $437.7M, which are larger than Maxeon Solar Technologies quarterly revenues of $88.6M. ASMPT's net income of $564.3K is higher than Maxeon Solar Technologies's net income of -$393.9M. Notably, ASMPT's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Maxeon Solar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASMPT is 2.77x versus 0.02x for Maxeon Solar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of 0.13% compared to ASMPT's net margin of 5.88%. ASMPT's return on equity of 4.56% beat Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.82%.

ASMPT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trio-Tech International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASMPT has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe ASMPT is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

ASMPT has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trio-Tech International has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.726%.

ASMPT has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Trio-Tech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASMPT pays 135.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Trio-Tech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASMPT quarterly revenues are $437.7M, which are larger than Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues of $8.6M. ASMPT's net income of $564.3K is higher than Trio-Tech International's net income of $507K. Notably, ASMPT's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Trio-Tech International's PE ratio is 39.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASMPT is 2.77x versus 0.57x for Trio-Tech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.