ANFGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Johnson Matthey PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of --. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.68% beat Johnson Matthey PLC's return on equity of 15.96%.

Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Johnson Matthey PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Antofagasta PLC has higher upside potential than Johnson Matthey PLC, analysts believe Antofagasta PLC is more attractive than Johnson Matthey PLC.

Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Matthey PLC has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.297%.

Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Johnson Matthey PLC offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 38.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Matthey PLC pays out 37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Johnson Matthey PLC quarterly revenues of --. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Johnson Matthey PLC's net income of --. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.61x while Johnson Matthey PLC's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.71x versus 0.28x for Johnson Matthey PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of 2.28%. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.68% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 8.17%.

Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $69.69 which suggests that it could grow by 15.96%. Given that LyondellBasell Industries NV has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe LyondellBasell Industries NV is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.

Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 0.832, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.843%.

Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 8.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 38.28% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 126.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Antofagasta PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but LyondellBasell Industries NV's is not.

Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $175M. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.61x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 18.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.71x versus 0.51x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of --. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.68% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 20.21%.

Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $76.11 which suggests that it could grow by 31.22%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.

Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.3%.

Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 6.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 38.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 60.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.61x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.71x versus 1.77x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.