Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…
Sell
46
ACGBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.18
Seasonality move
:
-7.86%
Day range:
$15.21 - $15.53
52-week range:
$9.96 - $16.63
Dividend yield:
7.94%
P/E ratio:
5.88x
P/S ratio:
2.34x
P/B ratio:
0.51x
Volume:
10.3K
Avg. volume:
35.5K
1-year change:
36.3%
Market cap:
$214B
Revenue:
$99B
EPS (TTM):
$2.60
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$587.3M | $1.71 | 35.27% | 67.95% | $140.33 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
$15.29 | -- | $214B | 5.88x | $0.40 | 7.94% | 2.34x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$101.68 | $140.33 | $14.2B | 20.40x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.17x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$1.92 | -- | $73.7M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.32x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.95 | -- | $7.9M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 6.03x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.14 | -- | $42.2M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 13.90x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.62 | -- | $69.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.29x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
53.05% | -0.435 | 218.66% | 48.29x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
22.81% | 1.152 | 9.66% | 0.67x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -2.488 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 1.248 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.507 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 4.940 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | 4.63% | 9.25% | 125.69% | -$106.4B |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$470.3M | $285.2M | 16.9% | 20.37% | 50.03% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Agricultural Bank of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of 42.23%. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.65 $920.7B FUTUFutu Holdings82.49% $1.72 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $140.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.01%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Agricultural Bank of China, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Agricultural Bank of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is ACGBY or FUTU More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.772%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.88x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.34x versus 8.17x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.34x 5.88x $25.7B $9.9B FUTUFutu Holdings8.17x 20.40x $570.1M $240.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.65 $920.7B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or MATH More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.88x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.34x versus 2.32x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.34x 5.88x $25.7B $9.9B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.32x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.65 $920.7B MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or MEGL More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.88x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.34x versus 6.03x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.34x 5.88x $25.7B $9.9B MEGLMagic Empire Global6.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.65 $920.7B TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or TOP More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.88x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.34x versus 13.90x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.34x 5.88x $25.7B $9.9B TOPTOP Financial Group13.90x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.65 $920.7B TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or TROO More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.036%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.88x while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.34x versus 6.29x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.34x 5.88x $25.7B $9.9B TROOTROOPS6.29x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 15.72% over the past day.
Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8
Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 5.86% over the past day.
Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8
LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 2.25% over the past day.
