Is IONQ The Next NVIDIA?
Quantum computing startup IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) has seen its stock skyrocket…
Sell
46
MMCA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.13
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$21.09 - $21.13
52-week range:
$20.60 - $21.83
Dividend yield:
3.64%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
306
Avg. volume:
3.5K
1-year change:
-0.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CALI
China Auto Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
$21.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.64% | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 2.9% | -- |
|
CALI
China Auto Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$48.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0% | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$49.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 3.02% | -- |
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
$49.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | 0.782 | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.034 | -- | -- |
|
CALI
China Auto Logistics
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.574 | -- | -- |
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CALI
China Auto Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MMCA or CA?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net margin of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMCA or CA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MMCA or CA More Risky?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMCA or CA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMCA or CA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -- CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MMCA or CALI?
China Auto Logistics has a net margin of -- compared to NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net margin of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of -- beat China Auto Logistics's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- CALIChina Auto Logistics-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMCA or CALI?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Auto Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has higher upside potential than China Auto Logistics, analysts believe NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is more attractive than China Auto Logistics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 CALIChina Auto Logistics0 0 0 -
Is MMCA or CALI More Risky?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMCA or CALI?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. China Auto Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Auto Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMCA or CALI?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Auto Logistics quarterly revenues of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of -- is lower than China Auto Logistics's net income of --. Notably, NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Auto Logistics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is -- versus -- for China Auto Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -- CALIChina Auto Logistics-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MMCA or CATF?
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net margin of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMCA or CATF?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has higher upside potential than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is more attractive than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MMCA or CATF More Risky?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMCA or CATF?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMCA or CATF?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is -- versus -- for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MMCA or DFCA?
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net margin of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of -- beat DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMCA or DFCA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has higher upside potential than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is more attractive than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MMCA or DFCA More Risky?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMCA or DFCA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMCA or DFCA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of -- is lower than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is -- versus -- for DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MMCA or GCAL?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a net margin of -- compared to NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net margin of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMCA or GCAL?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF, analysts believe NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 -
Is MMCA or GCAL More Risky?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMCA or GCAL?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMCA or GCAL?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues of --. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of --. Notably, NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -- GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
31
REGN alert for Jun 2
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is up 0.83% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for Jun 2
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 12.21% over the past day.
Sell
42
AMBA alert for Jun 2
Ambarella [AMBA] is up 0.21% over the past day.
