Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?
Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) offers an impressive yield, to say the…
Sell
36
GDOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.14
Seasonality move
:
-2.8%
Day range:
$29.60 - $30.20
52-week range:
$28.34 - $37.23
Dividend yield:
0.02%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.8K
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
-11.35%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IHI
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
|
$30.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.02% | -- |
|
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
|
$22.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.5% | -- |
|
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
|
$24.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.93% | -- |
|
IHI
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
|
$56.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.48% | -- |
|
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.4% | -- |
|
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
|
$21.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.069 | -- | -- |
|
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
|
-- | 1.198 | -- | -- |
|
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
|
-- | 0.835 | -- | -- |
|
IHI
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
|
-- | 1.252 | -- | -- |
|
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
|
-- | 1.226 | -- | -- |
|
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IHI
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GDOC or FMED?
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- FMEDFidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDOC or FMED?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF0 0 0 FMEDFidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDOC or FMED More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDOC or FMED?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDOC or FMED?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- -- FMEDFidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDOC or FTXH?
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDOC or FTXH?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is more attractive than First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF0 0 0 FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDOC or FTXH More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.143%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDOC or FTXH?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDOC or FTXH?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- -- FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDOC or IHI?
iShares US Medical Devices ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Medical Devices ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- IHIiShares US Medical Devices ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDOC or IHI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Medical Devices ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Medical Devices ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is more attractive than iShares US Medical Devices ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF0 0 0 IHIiShares US Medical Devices ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDOC or IHI More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Medical Devices ETF has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.854%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDOC or IHI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. iShares US Medical Devices ETF offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Medical Devices ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDOC or IHI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Medical Devices ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Medical Devices ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Medical Devices ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Medical Devices ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- -- IHIiShares US Medical Devices ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDOC or MEDI?
Harbor Health Care ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harbor Health Care ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- MEDIHarbor Health Care ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDOC or MEDI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harbor Health Care ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Harbor Health Care ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is more attractive than Harbor Health Care ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF0 0 0 MEDIHarbor Health Care ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDOC or MEDI More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harbor Health Care ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDOC or MEDI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Harbor Health Care ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harbor Health Care ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDOC or MEDI?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harbor Health Care ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harbor Health Care ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harbor Health Care ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Harbor Health Care ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- -- MEDIHarbor Health Care ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDOC or OZEM?
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- OZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDOC or OZEM?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is more attractive than Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF0 0 0 OZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDOC or OZEM More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDOC or OZEM?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDOC or OZEM?
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF-- -- -- -- OZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Did the Market Bottom Already?
The past few weeks have been among the most volatile…
Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 14
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 11.8% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 14
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 4.69% over the past day.
Sell
38
ZLAB alert for Apr 14
Zai Lab [ZLAB] is up 6.77% over the past day.
