Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…
Buy
54
FXI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.94
Seasonality move
:
1.57%
Day range:
$34.79 - $35.17
52-week range:
$24.59 - $38.73
Dividend yield:
1.53%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
62.7M
Avg. volume:
35.7M
1-year change:
28.91%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$35.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.53% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$26.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.14% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$18.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 3.67% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$22.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.34% | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$19.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 4.04% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$52.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 2.05% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.742 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.715 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.154 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.596 | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.994 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.933 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FXI or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FXI or ASHR?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is FXI or ASHR More Risky?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.199%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FXI or ASHR?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FXI or ASHR?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FXI or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FXI or EWH?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is FXI or EWH More Risky?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FXI or EWH?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FXI or EWH?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FXI or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FXI or FCA?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is FXI or FCA More Risky?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.075%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FXI or FCA?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FXI or FCA?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FXI or FLHK?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FXI or FLHK?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is FXI or FLHK More Risky?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.428%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FXI or FLHK?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FXI or FLHK?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FXI or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FXI or MCHI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FXI or MCHI More Risky?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FXI or MCHI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FXI or MCHI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.
Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31
Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.
