Financhill
Buy
52

FWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$80.38
Seasonality move :
17.72%
Day range:
$79.34 - $80.71
52-week range:
$61.22 - $86.67
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
244.4K
Avg. volume:
92.1K
1-year change:
29.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- --
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- --
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
$80.35 -- -- -- $1.50 0% --
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
$29.19 -- -- -- $0.13 1.1% --
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
$30.27 -- -- -- $0.33 1.1% --
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
$11.59 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
-- 0.714 -- --
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
-- 0.766 -- --
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
-- 1.454 -- --
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
-- 0.369 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

AB Disruptors ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FWD or CGGO?

    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. AB Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- --
    CGGO
    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FWD or CGGO?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF, analysts believe AB Disruptors ETF is more attractive than Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    0 0 0
    CGGO
    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FWD or CGGO More Risky?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FWD or CGGO?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. AB Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FWD or CGGO?

    AB Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CGGO
    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FWD or GSFP?

    Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. AB Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- --
    GSFP
    Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FWD or GSFP?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF, analysts believe AB Disruptors ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    0 0 0
    GSFP
    Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FWD or GSFP More Risky?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FWD or GSFP?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. AB Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FWD or GSFP?

    AB Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- -- --
    GSFP
    Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FWD or PCGG?

    Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. AB Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- --
    PCGG
    Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FWD or PCGG?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF, analysts believe AB Disruptors ETF is more attractive than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    0 0 0
    PCGG
    Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FWD or PCGG More Risky?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FWD or PCGG?

    AB Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polen Capital Global Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AB Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polen Capital Global Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FWD or PCGG?

    AB Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FWD
    AB Disruptors ETF
    -- -- -- --
    PCGG
    Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

If you’re looking for steady income, dividend stocks are a…

Will Uber Stock Recover?
Will Uber Stock Recover?

Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…

Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?

The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…

Stock Ideas

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x

Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11

Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.

Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11

Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.

Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11

Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock