Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…
Sell
13
FLYD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.92
Seasonality move
:
-8.04%
Day range:
$10.70 - $10.92
52-week range:
$9.93 - $42.88
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.3K
Avg. volume:
7.8K
1-year change:
-65.75%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARD
MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
$10.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
$11.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 5.42% | -- |
|
CARD
MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
$4.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
$11.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 8.8% | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
$19.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 4.79% | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
$9.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.74% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -4.462 | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -0.267 | -- | -- |
|
CARD
MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -2.814 | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | 0.087 | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -1.421 | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -2.840 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARD
MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLYD or BZQ?
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLYD or BZQ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped, analysts believe MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped0 0 0 -
Is FLYD or BZQ More Risky?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a beta of -2.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 306.348%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLYD or BZQ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLYD or BZQ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLYD or CARD?
MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- CARDMAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLYD or CARD?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN, analysts believe MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is more attractive than MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 CARDMAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 -
Is FLYD or CARD More Risky?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLYD or CARD?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLYD or CARD?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for MAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- CARDMAX Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLYD or FXP?
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLYD or FXP?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50, analysts believe MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 500 0 0 -
Is FLYD or FXP More Risky?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.107%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLYD or FXP?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 offers a yield of 8.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLYD or FXP?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLYD or MYY?
ProShares Short MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLYD or MYY?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Short MidCap400, analysts believe MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Short MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 MYYProShares Short MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is FLYD or MYY More Risky?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short MidCap400 has a beta of -1.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.252%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLYD or MYY?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Short MidCap400 offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLYD or MYY?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Short MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLYD or MZZ?
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLYD or MZZ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400, analysts believe MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN0 0 0 MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is FLYD or MZZ More Risky?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a beta of -2.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLYD or MZZ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLYD or MZZ?
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLYDMicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…
Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?
Cameco (NYSE: CCJ) isn’t exactly the kind of stock you…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 47x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
84
SBET alert for May 30
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 3.17% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for May 30
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.
Buy
73
CTEV alert for May 30
Claritev [CTEV] is up 7.82% over the past day.
