Financhill
Sell
45

CQQQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$40.59
Seasonality move :
-0.04%
Day range:
$40.39 - $41.07
52-week range:
$30.50 - $50.98
Dividend yield:
0.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
215.3K
Avg. volume:
340.4K
1-year change:
15.23%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
-- -- -- -- --
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-- -- -- -- --
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
-- -- -- -- --
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
-- -- -- -- --
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
$40.64 -- -- -- $0.11 0.27% --
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
$36.82 -- -- -- $0.07 0.51% --
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
$20.92 -- -- -- $0.37 2.41% --
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
$47.85 -- -- -- $0.70 1.87% --
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
$13.30 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
$32.74 -- -- -- $1.03 3.13% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
-- 0.359 -- --
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
-- 1.667 -- --
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-- -0.064 -- --
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
-- 0.106 -- --
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
-- 0.002 -- --
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-- 0.271 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Invesco China Technology ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or ARTY?

    iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- --
    ARTY
    iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or ARTY?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    0 0 0
    ARTY
    iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CQQQ or ARTY More Risky?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.562, which suggesting that the stock is 43.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has a beta of 1.213, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.319%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or ARTY?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. iShares Future AI & Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future AI & Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or ARTY?

    Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
    ARTY
    iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or CHIQ?

    Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- --
    CHIQ
    Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or CHIQ?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    0 0 0
    CHIQ
    Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CQQQ or CHIQ More Risky?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.562, which suggesting that the stock is 43.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.709%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or CHIQ?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or CHIQ?

    Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CHIQ
    Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or FLTW?

    Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- --
    FLTW
    Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or FLTW?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    0 0 0
    FLTW
    Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CQQQ or FLTW More Risky?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.562, which suggesting that the stock is 43.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.018%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or FLTW?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or FLTW?

    Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FLTW
    Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KSTR?

    KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- --
    KSTR
    KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KSTR?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    0 0 0
    KSTR
    KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CQQQ or KSTR More Risky?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.562, which suggesting that the stock is 43.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KSTR?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KSTR?

    Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
    KSTR
    KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KWEB?

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- --
    KWEB
    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KWEB?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    0 0 0
    KWEB
    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CQQQ or KWEB More Risky?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.562, which suggesting that the stock is 43.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.877%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KWEB?

    Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KWEB?

    Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CQQQ
    Invesco China Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
    KWEB
    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?

Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…

Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?

So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock