WOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of -6.48%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $5.70, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Intel.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.53x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of -5.22%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $5.70, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $59.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.84%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Microchip Technology, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Microchip Technology.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 83.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.53x versus 5.34x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 56.17%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $5.70, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $164.29 which suggests that it could grow by 48%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.53x versus 21.10x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 28.98%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.74%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $5.70, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $182.63 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.397%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 30.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.53x versus 9.32x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.