WNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of -11.03%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.3%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.6%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Castellum.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.70x versus 1.33x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of 11.54%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.57%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.3%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $84.31 which suggests that it could grow by 8.35%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.581%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 27.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5B. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $582M. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 17.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.70x versus 2.00x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of 4.19%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.3%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 27.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.70x versus 13.32x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of --. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.3%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -18.76%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.70x versus 10.98x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.