UWMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of -1.98% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 12.29%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.86% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 11.5%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.97%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $113.22 which suggests that it could grow by 9.2%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Mr. Cooper Group, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Mr. Cooper Group.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.834%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.52%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays -281.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $318.3M, which are smaller than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $651M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $80M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.00x while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 13.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 3.47x versus 2.53x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Onity Group has a net margin of -1.98% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 7.37%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.86% beat Onity Group's return on equity of 3.31%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.97%. On the other hand Onity Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Onity Group has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings, analysts believe Onity Group is more attractive than UWM Holdings.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.458%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.52%. Onity Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays -281.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $318.3M, which are larger than Onity Group quarterly revenues of $290.2M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Onity Group's net income of $21.4M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.00x while Onity Group's PE ratio is 22.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 3.47x versus 0.24x for Onity Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial has a net margin of -1.98% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 32.08%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.86% beat Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.32%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.97%. On the other hand Velocity Financial has an analysts' consensus of $18.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that Velocity Financial has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings, analysts believe Velocity Financial is more attractive than UWM Holdings.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.52%. Velocity Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays -281.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $318.3M, which are larger than Velocity Financial quarterly revenues of $49.3M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Velocity Financial's net income of $15.8M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.00x while Velocity Financial's PE ratio is 10.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 3.47x versus 3.43x for Velocity Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop has a net margin of -1.98% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 9.85%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.86% beat Walker & Dunlop's return on equity of 5.46%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.97%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop has an analysts' consensus of $116.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.37%. Given that Walker & Dunlop has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings, analysts believe Walker & Dunlop is more attractive than UWM Holdings.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.303%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.52%. Walker & Dunlop offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. UWM Holdings pays -281.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop pays out 79.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $318.3M, which are larger than Walker & Dunlop quarterly revenues of $292.3M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Walker & Dunlop's net income of $28.8M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.00x while Walker & Dunlop's PE ratio is 34.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 3.47x versus 2.96x for Walker & Dunlop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.