UMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -15.14%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.289, which suggesting that the stock is 28.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.252%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UMH Properties's is not.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is higher than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.62x while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 43.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.51x versus 2.96x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Annaly Capital Management has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of 55.31%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Annaly Capital Management's return on equity of 1.01%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Annaly Capital Management has an analysts' consensus of $20.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.46%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than Annaly Capital Management, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than Annaly Capital Management.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.289, which suggesting that the stock is 28.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Annaly Capital Management has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.355%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Annaly Capital Management offers a yield of 13.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Annaly Capital Management pays out -92.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are smaller than Annaly Capital Management quarterly revenues of $120.1M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is lower than Annaly Capital Management's net income of $66.4M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.62x while Annaly Capital Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.51x versus 32.84x for Annaly Capital Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Office Properties Income Trust has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -48.43%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Office Properties Income Trust's return on equity of -1.92%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Office Properties Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could fall by -18.48%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than Office Properties Income Trust, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than Office Properties Income Trust.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.289, which suggesting that the stock is 28.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Office Properties Income Trust has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.177%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Office Properties Income Trust offers a yield of 4.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Office Properties Income Trust pays out -91.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are smaller than Office Properties Income Trust quarterly revenues of $120.6M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is higher than Office Properties Income Trust's net income of -$58.4M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.62x while Office Properties Income Trust's PE ratio is 8.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.51x versus 0.09x for Office Properties Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of 28.02%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Rexford Industrial Realty has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.95%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than Rexford Industrial Realty, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than Rexford Industrial Realty.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.289, which suggesting that the stock is 28.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.357%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Rexford Industrial Realty offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Rexford Industrial Realty pays out 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are smaller than Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues of $241.8M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is lower than Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.62x while Rexford Industrial Realty's PE ratio is 31.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.51x versus 9.29x for Rexford Industrial Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.