TPVG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & has a net margin of 87.08% compared to TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margin of 6.78%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 2.93% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $7.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.35%. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is more attractive than Cohen &.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.101%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.28%. Cohen & offers a yield of 9.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays -137.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $31.7M. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net income of $22.6M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.48x while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is 12.08x versus 0.50x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 87.08% compared to TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margin of 82.11%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 2.93% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 9.95%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $7.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.35%. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of $25.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.6%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.109%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.28%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 11.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays -137.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $27.6M. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net income of $22.6M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $22.7M. Notably, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.48x while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 13.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is 12.08x versus 9.66x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PhenixFIN has a net margin of 87.08% compared to TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margin of 71.55%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 2.93% beat PhenixFIN's return on equity of 12.15%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $7.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.35%. On the other hand PhenixFIN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.57%. Given that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher upside potential than PhenixFIN, analysts believe TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is more attractive than PhenixFIN.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PhenixFIN has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.406%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.28%. PhenixFIN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays -137.92% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN pays out 14.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC quarterly revenues are $26M, which are larger than PhenixFIN quarterly revenues of $8.5M. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net income of $22.6M is higher than PhenixFIN's net income of $6.1M. Notably, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.48x while PhenixFIN's PE ratio is 5.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is 12.08x versus 3.50x for PhenixFIN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of 87.08% compared to TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margin of 96.31%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's return on equity of 2.93% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $7.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.35%. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is more attractive than Rand Capital.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.658%.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.28%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 8.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays -137.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC quarterly revenues are $26M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net income of $22.6M is higher than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.48x while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is 12.08x versus 3.55x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.